forked from Minki/linux
rcu: Break up rcu_gp_kthread() into subfunctions
Then rcu_gp_kthread() function is too large and furthermore needs to have the force_quiescent_state() code pulled in. This commit therefore breaks up rcu_gp_kthread() into rcu_gp_init() and rcu_gp_cleanup(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c856bafae7
commit
7fdefc10e1
264
kernel/rcutree.c
264
kernel/rcutree.c
@ -1027,96 +1027,160 @@ rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_dat
|
||||
__note_new_gpnum(rsp, rnp, rdp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Initialize a new grace period.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rcu_data *rdp;
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
rsp->gp_flags = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
|
||||
/* Grace period already in progress, don't start another. */
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rsp->fqs_active) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need a grace period, but force_quiescent_state()
|
||||
* is running. Tell it to start one on our behalf.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rsp->fqs_need_gp = 1;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Advance to a new grace period and initialize state. */
|
||||
rsp->gpnum++;
|
||||
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->gpnum, "start");
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(rsp->fqs_state == RCU_GP_INIT);
|
||||
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_INIT; /* Stop force_quiescent_state. */
|
||||
rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
|
||||
record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
|
||||
get_online_cpus();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the rcu_node
|
||||
* structures for all currently online CPUs in breadth-first order,
|
||||
* starting from the root rcu_node structure, relying on the layout
|
||||
* of the tree within the rsp->node[] array. Note that other CPUs
|
||||
* will access only the leaves of the hierarchy, thus seeing that no
|
||||
* grace period is in progress, at least until the corresponding
|
||||
* leaf node has been initialized. In addition, we have excluded
|
||||
* CPU-hotplug operations.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The grace period cannot complete until the initialization
|
||||
* process finishes, because this kthread handles both.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
|
||||
rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
|
||||
rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
|
||||
rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
|
||||
rnp->completed = rsp->completed;
|
||||
if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
|
||||
rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(rsp, rnp, rdp);
|
||||
rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(rnp);
|
||||
trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
|
||||
rnp->level, rnp->grplo,
|
||||
rnp->grphi, rnp->qsmask);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
/* force_quiescent_state() now OK. */
|
||||
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Clean up after the old grace period.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long gp_duration;
|
||||
struct rcu_data *rdp;
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
gp_duration = jiffies - rsp->gp_start;
|
||||
if (gp_duration > rsp->gp_max)
|
||||
rsp->gp_max = gp_duration;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We know the grace period is complete, but to everyone else
|
||||
* it appears to still be ongoing. But it is also the case
|
||||
* that to everyone else it looks like there is nothing that
|
||||
* they can do to advance the grace period. It is therefore
|
||||
* safe for us to drop the lock in order to mark the grace
|
||||
* period as completed in all of the rcu_node structures.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* But if this CPU needs another grace period, it will take
|
||||
* care of this while initializing the next grace period.
|
||||
* We use RCU_WAIT_TAIL instead of the usual RCU_DONE_TAIL
|
||||
* because the callbacks have not yet been advanced: Those
|
||||
* callbacks are waiting on the grace period that just now
|
||||
* completed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
|
||||
if (*rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] == NULL) {
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Propagate new ->completed value to rcu_node
|
||||
* structures so that other CPUs don't have to
|
||||
* wait until the start of the next grace period
|
||||
* to process their callbacks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
rnp->completed = rsp->gpnum;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum; /* Declare grace period done. */
|
||||
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->completed, "end");
|
||||
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE;
|
||||
if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp))
|
||||
rsp->gp_flags = 1;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Body of kthread that handles grace periods.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long gp_duration;
|
||||
struct rcu_data *rdp;
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp;
|
||||
struct rcu_state *rsp = arg;
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Handle grace-period start. */
|
||||
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
wait_event_interruptible(rsp->gp_wq, rsp->gp_flags);
|
||||
if (rsp->gp_flags)
|
||||
if (rsp->gp_flags && rcu_gp_init(rsp))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
flush_signals(current);
|
||||
}
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
rsp->gp_flags = 0;
|
||||
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
|
||||
|
||||
if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* A grace period is already in progress, so
|
||||
* don't start another one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rsp->fqs_active) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need a grace period, but force_quiescent_state()
|
||||
* is running. Tell it to start one on our behalf.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rsp->fqs_need_gp = 1;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Advance to a new grace period and initialize state. */
|
||||
rsp->gpnum++;
|
||||
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->gpnum, "start");
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(rsp->fqs_state == RCU_GP_INIT);
|
||||
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_INIT; /* Stop force_quiescent_state. */
|
||||
rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
|
||||
record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
|
||||
get_online_cpus();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the rcu_node
|
||||
* structures for all currently online CPUs in breadth-first
|
||||
* order, starting from the root rcu_node structure.
|
||||
* This operation relies on the layout of the hierarchy
|
||||
* within the rsp->node[] array. Note that other CPUs will
|
||||
* access only the leaves of the hierarchy, which still
|
||||
* indicate that no grace period is in progress, at least
|
||||
* until the corresponding leaf node has been initialized.
|
||||
* In addition, we have excluded CPU-hotplug operations.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
|
||||
rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
|
||||
rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
|
||||
rnp->completed = rsp->completed;
|
||||
if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
|
||||
rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(rsp, rnp, rdp);
|
||||
rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(rnp);
|
||||
trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
|
||||
rnp->level, rnp->grplo,
|
||||
rnp->grphi, rnp->qsmask);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
/* force_quiescent_state() now OK. */
|
||||
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Handle grace-period end. */
|
||||
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
@ -1125,56 +1189,12 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
|
||||
!ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
|
||||
!rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp));
|
||||
if (!ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
|
||||
!rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp))
|
||||
!rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp) &&
|
||||
rcu_gp_cleanup(rsp))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
flush_signals(current);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
gp_duration = jiffies - rsp->gp_start;
|
||||
if (gp_duration > rsp->gp_max)
|
||||
rsp->gp_max = gp_duration;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We know the grace period is complete, but to everyone else
|
||||
* it appears to still be ongoing. But it is also the case
|
||||
* that to everyone else it looks like there is nothing that
|
||||
* they can do to advance the grace period. It is therefore
|
||||
* safe for us to drop the lock in order to mark the grace
|
||||
* period as completed in all of the rcu_node structures.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* But if this CPU needs another grace period, it will take
|
||||
* care of this while initializing the next grace period.
|
||||
* We use RCU_WAIT_TAIL instead of the usual RCU_DONE_TAIL
|
||||
* because the callbacks have not yet been advanced: Those
|
||||
* callbacks are waiting on the grace period that just now
|
||||
* completed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (*rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] == NULL) {
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Propagate new ->completed value to rcu_node
|
||||
* structures so that other CPUs don't have to
|
||||
* wait until the start of the next grace period
|
||||
* to process their callbacks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
rnp->completed = rsp->gpnum;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum; /* Declare grace period done. */
|
||||
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->completed, "end");
|
||||
rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE;
|
||||
if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp))
|
||||
rsp->gp_flags = 1;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user