forked from Minki/linux
rds: don't let RDS shutdown a connection while senders are present
This is the first in a long line of patches that tries to fix races between RDS connection shutdown and RDS traffic. Here we are maintaining a count of active senders to make sure the connection doesn't go away while they are using it. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
38a4e5e613
commit
7e3f2952ee
@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static struct rds_connection *__rds_conn_create(__be32 laddr, __be32 faddr,
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&conn->c_send_lock);
|
||||
atomic_set(&conn->c_send_generation, 1);
|
||||
atomic_set(&conn->c_senders, 0);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->c_send_queue);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->c_retrans);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -276,6 +277,12 @@ void rds_conn_shutdown(struct rds_connection *conn)
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&conn->c_send_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&conn->c_send_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
while(atomic_read(&conn->c_senders)) {
|
||||
schedule_timeout(1);
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&conn->c_send_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&conn->c_send_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
conn->c_trans->conn_shutdown(conn);
|
||||
rds_conn_reset(conn);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -863,18 +863,6 @@ int rds_ib_recv(struct rds_connection *conn)
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
rdsdebug("conn %p\n", conn);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we get a temporary posting failure in this context then
|
||||
* we're really low and we want the caller to back off for a bit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ic->i_recv_mutex);
|
||||
if (rds_ib_recv_refill(conn, 0))
|
||||
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
else
|
||||
rds_ib_stats_inc(s_ib_rx_refill_from_thread);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ic->i_recv_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
if (rds_conn_up(conn))
|
||||
rds_ib_attempt_ack(ic);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -81,7 +81,10 @@ static void rds_message_purge(struct rds_message *rm)
|
||||
void rds_message_put(struct rds_message *rm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rdsdebug("put rm %p ref %d\n", rm, atomic_read(&rm->m_refcount));
|
||||
|
||||
if (atomic_read(&rm->m_refcount) == 0) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_CRIT "danger refcount zero on %p\n", rm);
|
||||
WARN_ON(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rm->m_refcount)) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rm->m_sock_item));
|
||||
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rm->m_conn_item));
|
||||
|
@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ struct rds_connection {
|
||||
|
||||
spinlock_t c_send_lock; /* protect send ring */
|
||||
atomic_t c_send_generation;
|
||||
atomic_t c_senders;
|
||||
struct rds_message *c_xmit_rm;
|
||||
unsigned long c_xmit_sg;
|
||||
unsigned int c_xmit_hdr_off;
|
||||
|
@ -60,15 +60,23 @@ void rds_send_reset(struct rds_connection *conn)
|
||||
struct rds_message *rm, *tmp;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&conn->c_send_lock, flags);
|
||||
if (conn->c_xmit_rm) {
|
||||
rm = conn->c_xmit_rm;
|
||||
conn->c_xmit_rm = NULL;
|
||||
/* Tell the user the RDMA op is no longer mapped by the
|
||||
* transport. This isn't entirely true (it's flushed out
|
||||
* independently) but as the connection is down, there's
|
||||
* no ongoing RDMA to/from that memory */
|
||||
rds_message_unmapped(conn->c_xmit_rm);
|
||||
rds_message_put(conn->c_xmit_rm);
|
||||
conn->c_xmit_rm = NULL;
|
||||
printk(KERN_CRIT "send reset unmapping %p\n", rm);
|
||||
rds_message_unmapped(rm);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conn->c_send_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
rds_message_put(rm);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conn->c_send_lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
conn->c_xmit_sg = 0;
|
||||
conn->c_xmit_hdr_off = 0;
|
||||
conn->c_xmit_data_off = 0;
|
||||
@ -131,6 +139,7 @@ restart:
|
||||
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
atomic_inc(&conn->c_senders);
|
||||
|
||||
if (conn->c_trans->xmit_prepare)
|
||||
conn->c_trans->xmit_prepare(conn);
|
||||
@ -350,6 +359,8 @@ restart:
|
||||
rds_send_remove_from_sock(&to_be_dropped, RDS_RDMA_DROPPED);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
atomic_dec(&conn->c_senders);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Other senders will see we have c_send_lock and exit. We
|
||||
* need to recheck the send queue and race again for c_send_lock
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user