From 76ca542d880ebe59a7a03c1597e73e1ded271857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:41:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm, lockdep: annotate reclaim context to zone reclaim too
Commit cf40bd16fd ("lockdep: annotate reclaim context") introduced reclaim
context annotation. But it didn't annotate zone reclaim. This patch do
it.
The point is, commit cf40bd16fd annotate __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim but
zone-reclaim doesn't use __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim.
current call graph is
__alloc_pages_nodemask
get_page_from_freelist
zone_reclaim()
__alloc_pages_slowpath
__alloc_pages_direct_reclaim
try_to_free_pages
Actually, if zone_reclaim_mode=1, VM never call
__alloc_pages_direct_reclaim in usual VM pressure.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 62782057fcb9..bc0f8db8340f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2557,6 +2557,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
* and RECLAIM_SWAP.
*/
p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE;
+ lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
@@ -2600,6 +2601,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
p->reclaim_state = NULL;
current->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE);
+ lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
return sc.nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages;
}