forked from Minki/linux
netdev-FAQ: clarify DaveM's position for stable backports
Per discussion with David at netconf 2018, let's clarify DaveM's position of handling stable backports in netdev-FAQ. This is important for people relying on upstream -stable releases. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
644c7eebbf
commit
75d4e704fa
@ -179,6 +179,15 @@ A: No. See above answer. In short, if you think it really belongs in
|
|||||||
dash marker line as described in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst to
|
dash marker line as described in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst to
|
||||||
temporarily embed that information into the patch that you send.
|
temporarily embed that information into the patch that you send.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Q: Are all networking bug fixes backported to all stable releases?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A: Due to capacity, Dave could only take care of the backports for the last
|
||||||
|
2 stable releases. For earlier stable releases, each stable branch maintainer
|
||||||
|
is supposed to take care of them. If you find any patch is missing from an
|
||||||
|
earlier stable branch, please notify stable@vger.kernel.org with either a
|
||||||
|
commit ID or a formal patch backported, and CC Dave and other relevant
|
||||||
|
networking developers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Q: Someone said that the comment style and coding convention is different
|
Q: Someone said that the comment style and coding convention is different
|
||||||
for the networking content. Is this true?
|
for the networking content. Is this true?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user