forked from Minki/linux
media: vivid: Fix wrong locking that causes race conditions on streaming stop
There is the same incorrect approach to locking implemented in vivid_stop_generating_vid_cap(), vivid_stop_generating_vid_out() and sdr_cap_stop_streaming(). These functions are called during streaming stopping with vivid_dev.mutex locked. And they all do the same mistake while stopping their kthreads, which need to lock this mutex as well. See the example from vivid_stop_generating_vid_cap(): /* shutdown control thread */ vivid_grab_controls(dev, false); mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex); kthread_stop(dev->kthread_vid_cap); dev->kthread_vid_cap = NULL; mutex_lock(&dev->mutex); But when this mutex is unlocked, another vb2_fop_read() can lock it instead of vivid_thread_vid_cap() and manipulate the buffer queue. That causes a use-after-free access later. To fix those issues let's: 1. avoid unlocking the mutex in vivid_stop_generating_vid_cap(), vivid_stop_generating_vid_out() and sdr_cap_stop_streaming(); 2. use mutex_trylock() with schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() in the loops of the vivid kthread handlers. Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # for v3.18 and up Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c90f649d2
commit
6dcd5d7a7a
@ -818,7 +818,11 @@ static int vivid_thread_vid_cap(void *data)
|
||||
if (kthread_should_stop())
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->mutex)) {
|
||||
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cur_jiffies = jiffies;
|
||||
if (dev->cap_seq_resync) {
|
||||
dev->jiffies_vid_cap = cur_jiffies;
|
||||
@ -998,8 +1002,6 @@ void vivid_stop_generating_vid_cap(struct vivid_dev *dev, bool *pstreaming)
|
||||
|
||||
/* shutdown control thread */
|
||||
vivid_grab_controls(dev, false);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
kthread_stop(dev->kthread_vid_cap);
|
||||
dev->kthread_vid_cap = NULL;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -166,7 +166,11 @@ static int vivid_thread_vid_out(void *data)
|
||||
if (kthread_should_stop())
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->mutex)) {
|
||||
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cur_jiffies = jiffies;
|
||||
if (dev->out_seq_resync) {
|
||||
dev->jiffies_vid_out = cur_jiffies;
|
||||
@ -344,8 +348,6 @@ void vivid_stop_generating_vid_out(struct vivid_dev *dev, bool *pstreaming)
|
||||
|
||||
/* shutdown control thread */
|
||||
vivid_grab_controls(dev, false);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
kthread_stop(dev->kthread_vid_out);
|
||||
dev->kthread_vid_out = NULL;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -141,7 +141,11 @@ static int vivid_thread_sdr_cap(void *data)
|
||||
if (kthread_should_stop())
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->mutex)) {
|
||||
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cur_jiffies = jiffies;
|
||||
if (dev->sdr_cap_seq_resync) {
|
||||
dev->jiffies_sdr_cap = cur_jiffies;
|
||||
@ -303,10 +307,8 @@ static void sdr_cap_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* shutdown control thread */
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
kthread_stop(dev->kthread_sdr_cap);
|
||||
dev->kthread_sdr_cap = NULL;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void sdr_cap_buf_request_complete(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user