Renesas ARM Based SoC Updates for v4.16

* Identify R-Car M3-W ES1.1
 
   Geert Uytterhoeven says "The Product Register of R-Car M3-W ES1.1
   incorrectly identifies the SoC revision as ES2.0.  Add a workaround to
   fix this."
 
   It is my understanding that this is likely to be forwards-compatibile.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE4nzZofWswv9L/nKF189kaWo3T74FAlonu8cACgkQ189kaWo3
 T76hcw//bUQJZvzI1VMIcfdu1KY47lu8GPGgPMyb2ULfuLcpRXG3AzFCzT5HJjBe
 BBPoCISEhuh4M6bpWyDs0AVkvJUjrTmiy6FPS1mqllh8rp6xx6v5OM9OP3cPyNzS
 ECY8TmPgij4oBbp5e0JvA+SnRp0biR750TXwIHytUtNe0o1R0kpyqo+OUtR79lTe
 rQyX4CRrNQozmUTsCiTuWf972jHJW4IInbrEr6PU89MB/WrdAiS6TnKxtDprGMqe
 5TzKGxd6UxuX/X7ZGte0+mTW5ur/Jgg2C4mQx6UD3Wp7iJn3geXsdxnwTA9dWi+0
 iz8l10/EY2bPBYm3UbiclDuv68uxFy3h+2pTYbguIvHvRqIwwpQzt0/iIwpkoNGN
 XDC6g4l4+B97opV+uoNJub2b64ev4gJQ3ugxfZMgQOKWA6FNjABmIpvlQKQzWylp
 B5R5fXz/eyhbqtzGcb7Y/7kS+ezO+8pz8WdwGRAQKQ0B/cGHeS3aoA6JaOZXIeN1
 nzVmKpeZfCiKGF16v8Ds6cz0QJcQWDHU/WMsPKS2KnHwd0ipp8DtR/F9PX+KNomv
 LZiUyJ5ER9g1bVEPm1K2zyQ0LbIfpQsw0xHAD05BEKflep+eleYOFhja/iX4hs+9
 n1wbz4GnhKFEG40lwq6Z0kwiKSupJrv9Wzbtb/Yv9SDOVD5Zj9M=
 =eL6d
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'renesas-soc-for-v4.16' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas into next/soc

Pull "Renesas ARM Based SoC Updates for v4.16" from Simon Horman:

* Identify R-Car M3-W ES1.1

  Geert Uytterhoeven says "The Product Register of R-Car M3-W ES1.1
  incorrectly identifies the SoC revision as ES2.0.  Add a workaround to
  fix this."

  It is my understanding that this is likely to be forwards-compatibile.

* tag 'renesas-soc-for-v4.16' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas:
  soc: renesas: Identify R-Car M3-W ES1.1
This commit is contained in:
Arnd Bergmann 2017-12-21 16:17:59 +01:00
commit 6b0b1a6b07

View File

@ -250,6 +250,9 @@ static int __init renesas_soc_init(void)
if (chipid) {
product = readl(chipid);
iounmap(chipid);
/* R-Car M3-W ES1.1 incorrectly identifies as ES2.0 */
if ((product & 0x7fff) == 0x5210)
product ^= 0x11;
if (soc->id && ((product >> 8) & 0xff) != soc->id) {
pr_warn("SoC mismatch (product = 0x%x)\n", product);
return -ENODEV;