forked from Minki/linux
stop_machine: Don't disable preemption in stop_two_cpus()
Now that stop_two_cpus() path does not check cpu_active() we can remove preempt_disable(), it was only needed to ensure that stop_machine() can not be called after we observe cpu_active() == T and before we queue the new work. Also, turn the pointless and confusing ->executed check into WARN_ON(). We know that both works must be executed, otherwise we have a bug. And in fact I think that done->executed should die, see the next changes. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151115193314.GA8249@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
64038f292a
commit
6a19005157
@ -258,7 +258,6 @@ int stop_two_cpus(unsigned int cpu1, unsigned int cpu2, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *
|
||||
struct cpu_stop_work work1, work2;
|
||||
struct multi_stop_data msdata;
|
||||
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
msdata = (struct multi_stop_data){
|
||||
.fn = fn,
|
||||
.data = arg,
|
||||
@ -277,16 +276,12 @@ int stop_two_cpus(unsigned int cpu1, unsigned int cpu2, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu1 > cpu2)
|
||||
swap(cpu1, cpu2);
|
||||
if (cpu_stop_queue_two_works(cpu1, &work1, cpu2, &work2)) {
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
if (cpu_stop_queue_two_works(cpu1, &work1, cpu2, &work2))
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
|
||||
wait_for_completion(&done.completion);
|
||||
|
||||
return done.executed ? done.ret : -ENOENT;
|
||||
WARN_ON(!done.executed);
|
||||
return done.ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user