bpf: Change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf_insn()
This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.
Fixes: 981f94c3e9
("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127022507.23674-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn
This commit is contained in:
parent
86ce322d21
commit
60e578e82b
@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
|
||||
insn->dst_reg,
|
||||
insn->off, insn->src_reg);
|
||||
else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
|
||||
(insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD ||
|
||||
(insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND ||
|
||||
insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) {
|
||||
verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n",
|
||||
insn->code,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user