forked from Minki/linux
sched/fair: Optimize select_idle_cpu
select_idle_cpu() will scan the LLC domain for idle CPUs, it's always expensive. so the next commit :1ad3aaf3fc
("sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu()") introduces a way to limit how many CPUs we scan. But it consume some CPUs out of 'nr' that are not allowed for the task and thus waste our attempts. The function always return nr_cpumask_bits, and we can't find a CPU which our task is allowed to run. Cpumask may be too big, similar to select_idle_core(), use per_cpu_ptr 'select_idle_mask' to prevent stack overflow. Fixes:1ad3aaf3fc
("sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu()") Signed-off-by: Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191213024530.28052-1-cj.chengjian@huawei.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
45178ac0ce
commit
60588bfa22
@ -5828,6 +5828,7 @@ static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
|
||||
struct sched_domain *this_sd;
|
||||
u64 avg_cost, avg_idle;
|
||||
u64 time, cost;
|
||||
@ -5859,11 +5860,11 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
|
||||
|
||||
time = cpu_clock(this);
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd), target) {
|
||||
cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
|
||||
if (!--nr)
|
||||
return si_cpu;
|
||||
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (available_idle_cpu(cpu))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (si_cpu == -1 && sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user