forked from Minki/linux
gfs2: Issue revokes more intelligently
Before this patch, function gfs2_write_revokes would call gfs2_ail1_empty, then traverse the sd_ail1_list looking for transactions that had bds which were no longer queued to a glock. And if it found some, it would try to issue revokes for them, up to a predetermined maximum. There were two problems with how it did this. First was the fact that gfs2_ail1_empty moves transactions which have nothing remaining on the ail1 list from the sd_ail1_list to the sd_ail2_list, thus making its traversal of sd_ail1_list miss them completely, and therefore, never issue revokes for them. Second was the fact that there were three traversals (or partial traversals) of the sd_ail1_list, each of which took and then released the sd_ail_lock lock: First inside gfs2_ail1_empty, second to determine if there are any revokes to be issued, and third to actually issue them. All this taking and releasing of the sd_ail_lock meant other processes could modify the lists and the conditions in which we're working. This patch simplies the whole process by adding a new parameter to function gfs2_ail1_empty, max_revokes. For normal calls, this is passed in as 0, meaning we don't want to issue any revokes. For function gfs2_write_revokes, we pass in the maximum number of revokes we can, thus allowing gfs2_ail1_empty to add the revokes where needed. This simplies the code, allows for a single holding of the sd_ail_lock, and allows gfs2_ail1_empty to add revokes for all the necessary bd items without missing any. Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d9f924958
commit
5e4c7632aa
@ -191,11 +191,13 @@ static void gfs2_ail1_start(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* gfs2_ail1_empty_one - Check whether or not a trans in the AIL has been synced
|
||||
* @sdp: the filesystem
|
||||
* @ai: the AIL entry
|
||||
* @tr: the transaction
|
||||
* @max_revokes: If nonzero, issue revokes for the bd items for written buffers
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static void gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
|
||||
static void gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr,
|
||||
int *max_revokes)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct gfs2_bufdata *bd, *s;
|
||||
struct buffer_head *bh;
|
||||
@ -220,6 +222,17 @@ static void gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
|
||||
gfs2_io_error_bh(sdp, bh);
|
||||
gfs2_withdraw_delayed(sdp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we have space for revokes and the bd is no longer on any
|
||||
* buf list, we can just add a revoke for it immediately and
|
||||
* avoid having to put it on the ail2 list, where it would need
|
||||
* to be revoked later.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (*max_revokes && list_empty(&bd->bd_list)) {
|
||||
gfs2_add_revoke(sdp, bd);
|
||||
(*max_revokes)--;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
list_move(&bd->bd_ail_st_list, &tr->tr_ail2_list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -227,11 +240,12 @@ static void gfs2_ail1_empty_one(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *tr)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* gfs2_ail1_empty - Try to empty the ail1 lists
|
||||
* @sdp: The superblock
|
||||
* @max_revokes: If non-zero, add revokes where appropriate
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Tries to empty the ail1 lists, starting with the oldest first
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static int gfs2_ail1_empty(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
|
||||
static int gfs2_ail1_empty(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, int max_revokes)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct gfs2_trans *tr, *s;
|
||||
int oldest_tr = 1;
|
||||
@ -239,7 +253,7 @@ static int gfs2_ail1_empty(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(tr, s, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_empty_one(sdp, tr);
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_empty_one(sdp, tr, &max_revokes);
|
||||
if (list_empty(&tr->tr_ail1_list) && oldest_tr)
|
||||
list_move(&tr->tr_list, &sdp->sd_ail2_list);
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -627,27 +641,24 @@ void gfs2_glock_remove_revoke(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* gfs2_write_revokes - Add as many revokes to the system transaction as we can
|
||||
* @sdp: The GFS2 superblock
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Our usual strategy is to defer writing revokes as much as we can in the hope
|
||||
* that we'll eventually overwrite the journal, which will make those revokes
|
||||
* go away. This changes when we flush the log: at that point, there will
|
||||
* likely be some left-over space in the last revoke block of that transaction.
|
||||
* We can fill that space with additional revokes for blocks that have already
|
||||
* been written back. This will basically come at no cost now, and will save
|
||||
* us from having to keep track of those blocks on the AIL2 list later.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void gfs2_write_revokes(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct gfs2_trans *tr;
|
||||
struct gfs2_bufdata *bd, *tmp;
|
||||
int have_revokes = 0;
|
||||
/* number of revokes we still have room for */
|
||||
int max_revokes = (sdp->sd_sb.sb_bsize - sizeof(struct gfs2_log_descriptor)) / sizeof(u64);
|
||||
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp);
|
||||
spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_reverse(tr, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(bd, &tr->tr_ail2_list, bd_ail_st_list) {
|
||||
if (list_empty(&bd->bd_list)) {
|
||||
have_revokes = 1;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
done:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
|
||||
if (have_revokes == 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
|
||||
while (sdp->sd_log_num_revoke > max_revokes)
|
||||
max_revokes += (sdp->sd_sb.sb_bsize - sizeof(struct gfs2_meta_header)) / sizeof(u64);
|
||||
max_revokes -= sdp->sd_log_num_revoke;
|
||||
@ -658,20 +669,7 @@ done:
|
||||
if (!sdp->sd_log_blks_reserved)
|
||||
atomic_dec(&sdp->sd_log_blks_free);
|
||||
}
|
||||
gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
|
||||
spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_reverse(tr, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(bd, tmp, &tr->tr_ail2_list, bd_ail_st_list) {
|
||||
if (max_revokes == 0)
|
||||
goto out_of_blocks;
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&bd->bd_list))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
gfs2_add_revoke(sdp, bd);
|
||||
max_revokes--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
out_of_blocks:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp, max_revokes);
|
||||
gfs2_log_unlock(sdp);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!sdp->sd_log_num_revoke) {
|
||||
@ -870,7 +868,7 @@ void gfs2_log_flush(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_glock *gl, u32 flags)
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_start(sdp);
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_wait(sdp);
|
||||
if (gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp))
|
||||
if (gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp, 0))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (gfs2_withdrawn(sdp))
|
||||
@ -1040,7 +1038,7 @@ int gfs2_logd(void *data)
|
||||
|
||||
did_flush = false;
|
||||
if (gfs2_jrnl_flush_reqd(sdp) || t == 0) {
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp);
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp, 0);
|
||||
gfs2_log_flush(sdp, NULL, GFS2_LOG_HEAD_FLUSH_NORMAL |
|
||||
GFS2_LFC_LOGD_JFLUSH_REQD);
|
||||
did_flush = true;
|
||||
@ -1049,7 +1047,7 @@ int gfs2_logd(void *data)
|
||||
if (gfs2_ail_flush_reqd(sdp)) {
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_start(sdp);
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_wait(sdp);
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp);
|
||||
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp, 0);
|
||||
gfs2_log_flush(sdp, NULL, GFS2_LOG_HEAD_FLUSH_NORMAL |
|
||||
GFS2_LFC_LOGD_AIL_FLUSH_REQD);
|
||||
did_flush = true;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user