forked from Minki/linux
scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Don't block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state
rport_dev_loss_timedout() sets the rport state to SRP_PORT_LOST and the SCSI target state to SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE. If this races with srp_reconnect_work(), a warning is printed: Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: dev_loss_tmo expired for SRP port-18:1 / host18. Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: scsi_internal_device_block(18:0:0:100) failed: ret = -22 Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: Call Trace: Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: ? scsi_target_unblock+0x50/0x50 [scsi_mod] Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: starget_for_each_device+0x80/0xb0 [scsi_mod] Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: target_block+0x24/0x30 [scsi_mod] Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: device_for_each_child+0x57/0x90 Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: srp_reconnect_rport+0xe4/0x230 [scsi_transport_srp] Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: srp_reconnect_work+0x40/0xc0 [scsi_transport_srp] Avoid this by not trying to block targets for rports in SRP_PORT_LOST state. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401091105.8046-1-mwilck@suse.com Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0352c3d395
commit
5cd0f6f576
@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ int srp_reconnect_rport(struct srp_rport *rport)
|
||||
res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rport->mutex);
|
||||
if (res)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
if (rport->state != SRP_RPORT_FAIL_FAST)
|
||||
if (rport->state != SRP_RPORT_FAIL_FAST && rport->state != SRP_RPORT_LOST)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* sdev state must be SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE, transition
|
||||
* to SDEV_BLOCK is illegal. Calling scsi_target_unblock()
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user