make 'user_access_begin()' do 'access_ok()'
Originally, the rule used to be that you'd have to do access_ok() separately, and then user_access_begin() before actually doing the direct (optimized) user access. But experience has shown that people then decide not to do access_ok() at all, and instead rely on it being implied by other operations or similar. Which makes it very hard to verify that the access has actually been range-checked. If you use the unsafe direct user accesses, hardware features (either SMAP - Supervisor Mode Access Protection - on x86, or PAN - Privileged Access Never - on ARM) do force you to use user_access_begin(). But nothing really forces the range check. By putting the range check into user_access_begin(), we actually force people to do the right thing (tm), and the range check vill be visible near the actual accesses. We have way too long a history of people trying to avoid them. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -354,10 +354,9 @@ long compat_get_bitmap(unsigned long *mask, const compat_ulong_t __user *umask,
|
||||
bitmap_size = ALIGN(bitmap_size, BITS_PER_COMPAT_LONG);
|
||||
nr_compat_longs = BITS_TO_COMPAT_LONGS(bitmap_size);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!access_ok(umask, bitmap_size / 8))
|
||||
if (!user_access_begin(umask, bitmap_size / 8))
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
|
||||
user_access_begin();
|
||||
while (nr_compat_longs > 1) {
|
||||
compat_ulong_t l1, l2;
|
||||
unsafe_get_user(l1, umask++, Efault);
|
||||
@@ -384,10 +383,9 @@ long compat_put_bitmap(compat_ulong_t __user *umask, unsigned long *mask,
|
||||
bitmap_size = ALIGN(bitmap_size, BITS_PER_COMPAT_LONG);
|
||||
nr_compat_longs = BITS_TO_COMPAT_LONGS(bitmap_size);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!access_ok(umask, bitmap_size / 8))
|
||||
if (!user_access_begin(umask, bitmap_size / 8))
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
|
||||
user_access_begin();
|
||||
while (nr_compat_longs > 1) {
|
||||
unsigned long m = *mask++;
|
||||
unsafe_put_user((compat_ulong_t)m, umask++, Efault);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user