leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

btrfs: change btrfs_free_reserved_bytes to return void

Browse Source 
btrfs_free_reserved_bytes uses the variable "ret" for return value,
but it is not modified after initialzation. Further, I find that any of
the callers do not handle the return value, so it is safe to drop the
unneeded "ret" and return void. There are no callees that would need the
function to handle or pass the value either.

Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
zhong jiang 2018-08-17 00:37:14 +08:00 committed by David Sterba
parent bee6ec822a
commit 556f3ca88e
1 changed files with 2 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
View File

@ -6422,11 +6422,10 @@ static int btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
* reserve set to 0 in order to clear the reservation.
*/
static int btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
u64 num_bytes, int delalloc)
static void btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
u64 num_bytes, int delalloc)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = cache->space_info;
int ret = 0;
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
@ -6439,7 +6438,6 @@ static int btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes;
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
return ret;
}
void btrfs_prepare_extent_commit(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{