selftests/bpf: subtraction bounds test
There is a bug in the verifier's handling of BPF_SUB: [a,b] - [c,d] yields was [a-c, b-d] rather than the correct [a-d, b-c]. So here is a test which, with the bogus handling, will produce ranges of [0,0] and thus allowed accesses; whereas the correct handling will give a range of [-255, 255] (and hence the right-shift will give a range of [0, 255]) and the accesses will be rejected. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
70dba204a3
commit
545722cb0f
@ -5980,6 +5980,34 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"subtraction bounds (map value)",
|
||||
.insns = {
|
||||
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
|
||||
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
|
||||
BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, 0xff, 7),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 1),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, 0xff, 5),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 56),
|
||||
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
|
||||
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
|
||||
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
|
||||
.result = REJECT,
|
||||
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user