tick-common: Fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()
tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is possible or not. It does this as the first check: if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) return false; Thats wrong. tick_check_percpu() returns true when the device is useable. Check for false instead. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+ Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com Cc: Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com Cc: linaro-networking@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/486a02efe0246635aaba786e24b42d316438bf3b.1397537987.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									55101e2d6c
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						521c42990e
					
				| @ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev, | ||||
| bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev, | ||||
| 			    struct clock_event_device *newdev) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) | ||||
| 	if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) | ||||
| 		return false; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev); | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user