forked from Minki/linux
drm/i915/vlv: Update Wait for FIFO and wait for 20 free entries. v3
On VLV, FIFO will be shared by both SW and HW. So, we read the free entries through register and update dev_priv variable and wait for only 20 entries to be free From Deepak's follow-up mail explaining why vlv is special: "On SB, Out of 64 FIFO Entries, 20 Entries will be used by HW and remaining 44 will be used by the SW,. I think due to this reason, we have a threshold of 20 Entries." "On VLV, HW and SW can access all 64 fifo entries, I don't think having a threshold of 20 Entries is mandatory on VLV. Also, since both SW and HW can access all 64 Entries. I think on VLV, we need to update the fifo_count before waiting for the FIFO." v2: Apply mask when we read the number of free FIFO entries (Ville). v3: Mask applied after reading the register (Deepak). Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com> [danvet: Add further explanation from Deepak to commit message.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f1c2e2468
commit
5135d64b7f
@ -150,6 +150,13 @@ static int __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* On VLV, FIFO will be shared by both SW and HW.
|
||||
* So, we need to read the FREE_ENTRIES everytime */
|
||||
if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
|
||||
dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count =
|
||||
__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) &
|
||||
GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
|
||||
|
||||
if (dev_priv->uncore.fifo_count < GT_FIFO_NUM_RESERVED_ENTRIES) {
|
||||
int loop = 500;
|
||||
u32 fifo = __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, GTFIFOCTL) & GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_MASK;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user