forked from Minki/linux
btrfs: make read_block_group_item return void
Since it's inclusion on 9afc66498a
("btrfs: block-group: refactor how
we read one block group item") this function always returned 0, so there
is no need to check for the returned value.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
24646481fb
commit
4c448ce8b4
@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@ static int check_chunk_block_group_mappings(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int read_block_group_item(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
|
||||
static void read_block_group_item(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
|
||||
struct btrfs_path *path,
|
||||
const struct btrfs_key *key)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -1887,8 +1887,6 @@ static int read_block_group_item(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
|
||||
sizeof(bgi));
|
||||
cache->used = btrfs_stack_block_group_used(&bgi);
|
||||
cache->flags = btrfs_stack_block_group_flags(&bgi);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int read_one_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
|
||||
@ -1907,9 +1905,7 @@ static int read_one_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
|
||||
if (!cache)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = read_block_group_item(cache, path, key);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
read_block_group_item(cache, path, key);
|
||||
|
||||
set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user