ARM: pxa: remove pxa95x support
PXA95x isn't widely used. And it adds the effort on supporting multiple platform. So remove it. The assumption is that nobody will miss this support. If you are reading this text because you actually require pxa95x support on a new kernel, we can work out a way to revert this patch or add support to the mmp platform. Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Arnd Bergmann
parent
b5932cc839
commit
49ea7fc094
@@ -194,17 +194,6 @@
|
||||
#define __cpu_is_pxa935(id) (0)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PXA955
|
||||
#define __cpu_is_pxa955(id) \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
unsigned int _id = (id) >> 4 & 0xfff; \
|
||||
_id == 0x581 || _id == 0xc08 \
|
||||
|| _id == 0xb76; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define __cpu_is_pxa955(id) (0)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#define cpu_is_pxa210() \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
__cpu_is_pxa210(read_cpuid_id()); \
|
||||
@@ -255,10 +244,6 @@
|
||||
__cpu_is_pxa935(read_cpuid_id()); \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
#define cpu_is_pxa955() \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
__cpu_is_pxa955(read_cpuid_id()); \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -297,15 +282,6 @@
|
||||
#define __cpu_is_pxa93x(id) (0)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_PXA95x
|
||||
#define __cpu_is_pxa95x(id) \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
__cpu_is_pxa955(id); \
|
||||
})
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define __cpu_is_pxa95x(id) (0)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#define cpu_is_pxa2xx() \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
__cpu_is_pxa2xx(read_cpuid_id()); \
|
||||
@@ -321,10 +297,6 @@
|
||||
__cpu_is_pxa93x(read_cpuid_id()); \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
#define cpu_is_pxa95x() \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
__cpu_is_pxa95x(read_cpuid_id()); \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* return current memory and LCD clock frequency in units of 10kHz
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user