forked from Minki/linux
NFC: add NCI_UNREG flag to eliminate the race
There are two sites that calls queue_work() after the
destroy_workqueue() and lead to possible UAF.
The first site is nci_send_cmd(), which can happen after the
nci_close_device as below
nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev | nfc_genl_dev_up
nci_close_device |
flush_workqueue |
del_timer_sync |
nci_unregister_device | nfc_get_device
destroy_workqueue | nfc_dev_up
nfc_unregister_device | nci_dev_up
device_del | nci_open_device
| __nci_request
| nci_send_cmd
| queue_work !!!
Another site is nci_cmd_timer, awaked by the nci_cmd_work from the
nci_send_cmd.
... | ...
nci_unregister_device | queue_work
destroy_workqueue |
nfc_unregister_device | ...
device_del | nci_cmd_work
| mod_timer
| ...
| nci_cmd_timer
| queue_work !!!
For the above two UAF, the root cause is that the nfc_dev_up can race
between the nci_unregister_device routine. Therefore, this patch
introduce NCI_UNREG flag to easily eliminate the possible race. In
addition, the mutex_lock in nci_close_device can act as a barrier.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
Fixes: 6a2968aaf5
("NFC: basic NCI protocol implementation")
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211116152732.19238-1-linma@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e3b5dfcd1
commit
48b71a9e66
@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ enum nci_flag {
|
||||
NCI_UP,
|
||||
NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE,
|
||||
NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE_TO,
|
||||
NCI_UNREG,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* NCI device states */
|
||||
|
@ -476,6 +476,11 @@ static int nci_open_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ndev->req_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(NCI_UNREG, &ndev->flags)) {
|
||||
rc = -ENODEV;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(NCI_UP, &ndev->flags)) {
|
||||
rc = -EALREADY;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
@ -548,6 +553,10 @@ done:
|
||||
static int nci_close_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nci_req_cancel(ndev, ENODEV);
|
||||
|
||||
/* This mutex needs to be held as a barrier for
|
||||
* caller nci_unregister_device
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ndev->req_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!test_and_clear_bit(NCI_UP, &ndev->flags)) {
|
||||
@ -585,8 +594,8 @@ static int nci_close_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
|
||||
|
||||
del_timer_sync(&ndev->cmd_timer);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Clear flags */
|
||||
ndev->flags = 0;
|
||||
/* Clear flags except NCI_UNREG */
|
||||
ndev->flags &= BIT(NCI_UNREG);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ndev->req_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1269,6 +1278,12 @@ void nci_unregister_device(struct nci_dev *ndev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct nci_conn_info *conn_info, *n;
|
||||
|
||||
/* This set_bit is not protected with specialized barrier,
|
||||
* However, it is fine because the mutex_lock(&ndev->req_lock);
|
||||
* in nci_close_device() will help to emit one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
set_bit(NCI_UNREG, &ndev->flags);
|
||||
|
||||
nci_close_device(ndev);
|
||||
|
||||
destroy_workqueue(ndev->cmd_wq);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user