powerpc/numa: Associate numa node to its cpu earlier
powerpc is the only platform that do not rely on cpu_up()->try_online_node() to bring up a numa node, and special cases it, instead, deep in its own machinery: dlpar_online_cpu find_and_online_cpu_nid try_online_node This should not be needed, but the thing is that the try_online_node() from cpu_up() will not apply on the right node, because cpu_to_node() will return the old mapping numa<->cpu that gets set on boot stage for all possible cpus. That can be seen easily if we try to print out the numa node passed to try_online_node() in cpu_up(). The thing is that the numa<->cpu mapping does not get updated till a much later stage in start_secondary: start_secondary: set_numa_node(numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]) But we do not really care, as we already now the CPU <-> NUMA associativity back in find_and_online_cpu_nid(), so let us make use of that and set the proper numa<->cpu mapping, so cpu_to_node() in cpu_up() returns the right node and try_online_node() can do its work. Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Tested-by: Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220411074934.4632-1-osalvador@suse.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a9c5ff5ff
commit
48b63961c8
@ -111,14 +111,10 @@ static inline void unmap_cpu_from_node(unsigned long cpu) {}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
|
||||
extern int find_and_online_cpu_nid(int cpu);
|
||||
void find_and_update_cpu_nid(int cpu);
|
||||
extern int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static inline int find_and_online_cpu_nid(int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void find_and_update_cpu_nid(int cpu) {}
|
||||
static inline int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
|
@ -1422,42 +1422,26 @@ out:
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int find_and_online_cpu_nid(int cpu)
|
||||
void find_and_update_cpu_nid(int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__be32 associativity[VPHN_ASSOC_BUFSIZE] = {0};
|
||||
int new_nid;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Use associativity from first thread for all siblings */
|
||||
if (vphn_get_associativity(cpu, associativity))
|
||||
return cpu_to_node(cpu);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Do not have previous associativity, so find it now. */
|
||||
new_nid = associativity_to_nid(associativity);
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_nid < 0 || !node_possible(new_nid))
|
||||
new_nid = first_online_node;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!node_online(new_nid)) {
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Need to ensure that NODE_DATA is initialized for a node from
|
||||
* available memory (see memblock_alloc_try_nid). If unable to
|
||||
* init the node, then default to nearest node that has memory
|
||||
* installed. Skip onlining a node if the subsystems are not
|
||||
* yet initialized.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!topology_inited || try_online_node(new_nid))
|
||||
new_nid = first_online_node;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Default to using the nearest node that has memory installed.
|
||||
* Otherwise, it would be necessary to patch the kernel MM code
|
||||
* to deal with more memoryless-node error conditions.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
new_nid = first_online_node;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
// Associate node <-> cpu, so cpu_up() calls
|
||||
// try_online_node() on the right node.
|
||||
set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, new_nid);
|
||||
|
||||
pr_debug("%s:%d cpu %d nid %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, cpu, new_nid);
|
||||
return new_nid;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
|
||||
|
@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int dlpar_online_cpu(struct device_node *dn)
|
||||
if (get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu) != thread)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
cpu_maps_update_done();
|
||||
find_and_online_cpu_nid(cpu);
|
||||
find_and_update_cpu_nid(cpu);
|
||||
rc = device_online(get_cpu_device(cpu));
|
||||
if (rc) {
|
||||
dlpar_offline_cpu(dn);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user