forked from Minki/linux
rcu: Make RCU able to tolerate undefined CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
This commit introduces an RCU_FANOUT_LEAF C-preprocessor macro so that RCU will build even when CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF is undefined. The RCU_FANOUT_LEAF macro is set to the value of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF when defined, otherwise it is set to 32 for 32-bit systems and 64 for 64-bit systems. This commit then makes CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF depend on CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT, so that Kconfig users won't be asked about CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF unless they want to be. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
05c5df31af
commit
47d631af58
@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ config RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
|
||||
int "Tree-based hierarchical RCU leaf-level fanout value"
|
||||
range 2 64 if 64BIT
|
||||
range 2 32 if !64BIT
|
||||
depends on TREE_RCU || PREEMPT_RCU
|
||||
depends on (TREE_RCU || PREEMPT_RCU) && RCU_EXPERT
|
||||
default 16
|
||||
help
|
||||
This option controls the leaf-level fanout of hierarchical
|
||||
|
@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ module_param(dump_tree, bool, 0444);
|
||||
/* Control rcu_node-tree auto-balancing at boot time. */
|
||||
static bool rcu_fanout_exact;
|
||||
module_param(rcu_fanout_exact, bool, 0444);
|
||||
/* Increase (but not decrease) the CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF at boot time. */
|
||||
static int rcu_fanout_leaf = CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF;
|
||||
/* Increase (but not decrease) the RCU_FANOUT_LEAF at boot time. */
|
||||
static int rcu_fanout_leaf = RCU_FANOUT_LEAF;
|
||||
module_param(rcu_fanout_leaf, int, 0444);
|
||||
int rcu_num_lvls __read_mostly = RCU_NUM_LVLS;
|
||||
static int num_rcu_lvl[] = { /* Number of rcu_nodes at specified level. */
|
||||
@ -4097,7 +4097,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
|
||||
jiffies_till_next_fqs = d;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the compile-time values are accurate, just leave. */
|
||||
if (rcu_fanout_leaf == CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF &&
|
||||
if (rcu_fanout_leaf == RCU_FANOUT_LEAF &&
|
||||
nr_cpu_ids == NR_CPUS)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
pr_info("RCU: Adjusting geometry for rcu_fanout_leaf=%d, nr_cpu_ids=%d\n",
|
||||
@ -4121,7 +4121,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
|
||||
* the configured number of CPUs. Complain and fall back to the
|
||||
* compile-time values if these limits are exceeded.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rcu_fanout_leaf < CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF ||
|
||||
if (rcu_fanout_leaf < RCU_FANOUT_LEAF ||
|
||||
rcu_fanout_leaf > sizeof(unsigned long) * 8 ||
|
||||
n > rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS]) {
|
||||
WARN_ON(1);
|
||||
|
@ -48,7 +48,17 @@
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT */
|
||||
|
||||
#define RCU_FANOUT_1 (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF)
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
|
||||
#define RCU_FANOUT_LEAF CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
|
||||
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF */
|
||||
# ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
|
||||
# define RCU_FANOUT_LEAF 64
|
||||
# else
|
||||
# define RCU_FANOUT_LEAF 32
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF */
|
||||
|
||||
#define RCU_FANOUT_1 (RCU_FANOUT_LEAF)
|
||||
#define RCU_FANOUT_2 (RCU_FANOUT_1 * RCU_FANOUT)
|
||||
#define RCU_FANOUT_3 (RCU_FANOUT_2 * RCU_FANOUT)
|
||||
#define RCU_FANOUT_4 (RCU_FANOUT_3 * RCU_FANOUT)
|
||||
|
@ -76,10 +76,10 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
|
||||
pr_info("\tAdditional per-CPU info printed with stalls.\n");
|
||||
if (NUM_RCU_LVL_4 != 0)
|
||||
pr_info("\tFour-level hierarchy is enabled.\n");
|
||||
if (CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF != 16)
|
||||
if (RCU_FANOUT_LEAF != 16)
|
||||
pr_info("\tBuild-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n",
|
||||
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF);
|
||||
if (rcu_fanout_leaf != CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF)
|
||||
RCU_FANOUT_LEAF);
|
||||
if (rcu_fanout_leaf != RCU_FANOUT_LEAF)
|
||||
pr_info("\tBoot-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n", rcu_fanout_leaf);
|
||||
if (nr_cpu_ids != NR_CPUS)
|
||||
pr_info("\tRCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=%d to nr_cpu_ids=%d.\n", NR_CPUS, nr_cpu_ids);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user