forked from Minki/linux
NFSv4.1: Don't update sequence number if rpc_task is not sent
If we fail to contact the gss upcall program, then no message will be sent to the server. The client still updated the sequence number, however, and this lead to NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISMATCH for the next several RPC calls. Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
47c2199b6e
commit
468f86134e
@ -444,8 +444,8 @@ static int nfs41_sequence_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs4_sequence_res *
|
||||
if (res->sr_status == 1)
|
||||
res->sr_status = NFS_OK;
|
||||
|
||||
/* -ERESTARTSYS can result in skipping nfs41_sequence_setup */
|
||||
if (!res->sr_slot)
|
||||
/* don't increment the sequence number if the task wasn't sent */
|
||||
if (!RPC_WAS_SENT(task))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check the SEQUENCE operation status */
|
||||
|
@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct rpc_task_setup {
|
||||
#define RPC_TASK_KILLED 0x0100 /* task was killed */
|
||||
#define RPC_TASK_SOFT 0x0200 /* Use soft timeouts */
|
||||
#define RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN 0x0400 /* Fail if can't connect */
|
||||
#define RPC_TASK_SENT 0x0800 /* message was sent */
|
||||
|
||||
#define RPC_IS_ASYNC(t) ((t)->tk_flags & RPC_TASK_ASYNC)
|
||||
#define RPC_IS_SWAPPER(t) ((t)->tk_flags & RPC_TASK_SWAPPER)
|
||||
@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ struct rpc_task_setup {
|
||||
#define RPC_ASSASSINATED(t) ((t)->tk_flags & RPC_TASK_KILLED)
|
||||
#define RPC_IS_SOFT(t) ((t)->tk_flags & RPC_TASK_SOFT)
|
||||
#define RPC_IS_SOFTCONN(t) ((t)->tk_flags & RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN)
|
||||
#define RPC_WAS_SENT(t) ((t)->tk_flags & RPC_TASK_SENT)
|
||||
|
||||
#define RPC_TASK_RUNNING 0
|
||||
#define RPC_TASK_QUEUED 1
|
||||
|
@ -906,6 +906,7 @@ void xprt_transmit(struct rpc_task *task)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dprintk("RPC: %5u xmit complete\n", task->tk_pid);
|
||||
task->tk_flags |= RPC_TASK_SENT;
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
xprt->ops->set_retrans_timeout(task);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user