forked from Minki/linux
bpf: Make dst_port field in struct bpf_sock 16-bit wide
Menglong Dong reports that the documentation for the dst_port field in struct bpf_sock is inaccurate and confusing. From the BPF program PoV, the field is a zero-padded 16-bit integer in network byte order. The value appears to the BPF user as if laid out in memory as so: offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) + 0 <port MSB> + 8 <port LSB> +16 0x00 +24 0x00 32-, 16-, and 8-bit wide loads from the field are all allowed, but only if the offset into the field is 0. 32-bit wide loads from dst_port are especially confusing. The loaded value, after converting to host byte order with bpf_ntohl(dst_port), contains the port number in the upper 16-bits. Remove the confusion by splitting the field into two 16-bit fields. For backward compatibility, allow 32-bit wide loads from offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port). While at it, allow loads 8-bit loads at offset [0] and [1] from dst_port. Reported-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130115518.213259-2-jakub@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b3dddab2ff
commit
4421a58271
@ -5574,7 +5574,8 @@ struct bpf_sock {
|
||||
__u32 src_ip4;
|
||||
__u32 src_ip6[4];
|
||||
__u32 src_port; /* host byte order */
|
||||
__u32 dst_port; /* network byte order */
|
||||
__be16 dst_port; /* network byte order */
|
||||
__u16 :16; /* zero padding */
|
||||
__u32 dst_ip4;
|
||||
__u32 dst_ip6[4];
|
||||
__u32 state;
|
||||
|
@ -8265,6 +8265,7 @@ bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
|
||||
struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const int size_default = sizeof(__u32);
|
||||
int field_size;
|
||||
|
||||
if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct bpf_sock))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@ -8276,7 +8277,6 @@ bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
|
||||
case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, family):
|
||||
case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type):
|
||||
case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, protocol):
|
||||
case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port):
|
||||
case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port):
|
||||
case offsetof(struct bpf_sock, rx_queue_mapping):
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4):
|
||||
@ -8285,6 +8285,14 @@ bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct bpf_sock, dst_ip6[0], dst_ip6[3]):
|
||||
bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, size_default);
|
||||
return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, size_default);
|
||||
case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock, dst_port):
|
||||
field_size = size == size_default ?
|
||||
size_default : sizeof_field(struct bpf_sock, dst_port);
|
||||
bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, field_size);
|
||||
return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, field_size);
|
||||
case offsetofend(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) ...
|
||||
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_ip4) - 1:
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return size == size_default;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user