forked from Minki/linux
powerpc/memtrace: Remove memory in chunks
When hot-removing memory release_mem_region_adjustable() splits iomem resources if they are not the exact size of the memory being hot-deleted. Adding this memory back to the kernel adds a new resource. Eg a node has memory 0x0 - 0xfffffffff. Hot-removing 1GB from 0xf40000000 results in the single resource 0x0-0xfffffffff being split into two resources: 0x0-0xf3fffffff and 0xf80000000-0xfffffffff. When we hot-add the memory back we now have three resources: 0x0-0xf3fffffff, 0xf40000000-0xf7fffffff, and 0xf80000000-0xfffffffff. This is an issue if we try to remove some memory that overlaps resources. Eg when trying to remove 2GB at address 0xf40000000, release_mem_region_adjustable() fails as it expects the chunk of memory to be within the boundaries of a single resource. We then get the warning: "Unable to release resource" and attempting to use memtrace again gives us this error: "bash: echo: write error: Resource temporarily unavailable" This patch makes memtrace remove memory in chunks that are always the same size from an address that is always equal to end_of_memory - n*size, for some n. So hotremoving and hotadding memory of different sizes will now not attempt to remove memory that spans multiple resources. Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
be54c1216f
commit
3f7daf3d75
@ -90,17 +90,15 @@ static bool memtrace_offline_pages(u32 nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 nr_pages)
|
||||
walk_memory_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, (void *)MEM_OFFLINE,
|
||||
change_memblock_state);
|
||||
|
||||
lock_device_hotplug();
|
||||
remove_memory(nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
|
||||
unlock_device_hotplug();
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u64 memtrace_alloc_node(u32 nid, u64 size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 start_pfn, end_pfn, nr_pages;
|
||||
u64 start_pfn, end_pfn, nr_pages, pfn;
|
||||
u64 base_pfn;
|
||||
u64 bytes = memory_block_size_bytes();
|
||||
|
||||
if (!node_spanned_pages(nid))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -113,8 +111,21 @@ static u64 memtrace_alloc_node(u32 nid, u64 size)
|
||||
end_pfn = round_down(end_pfn - nr_pages, nr_pages);
|
||||
|
||||
for (base_pfn = end_pfn; base_pfn > start_pfn; base_pfn -= nr_pages) {
|
||||
if (memtrace_offline_pages(nid, base_pfn, nr_pages) == true)
|
||||
if (memtrace_offline_pages(nid, base_pfn, nr_pages) == true) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Remove memory in memory block size chunks so that
|
||||
* iomem resources are always split to the same size and
|
||||
* we never try to remove memory that spans two iomem
|
||||
* resources.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lock_device_hotplug();
|
||||
end_pfn = base_pfn + nr_pages;
|
||||
for (pfn = base_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += bytes>> PAGE_SHIFT) {
|
||||
remove_memory(nid, pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, bytes);
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlock_device_hotplug();
|
||||
return base_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user