forked from Minki/linux
percpu_ref: restructure operation mode switching
Restructure atomic/percpu mode switching. * The users of __percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic/percpu() now call a new function __percpu_ref_switch_mode() which calls either of the original switching functions depending on the current state of ref->force_atomic and the __PERCPU_REF_DEAD flag. The callers no longer check whether switching is necessary but always invoke __percpu_ref_switch_mode(). * !ref->confirm_switch waiting is collected into __percpu_ref_switch_mode(). This patch doesn't cause any behavior differences. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
18808354b7
commit
3f49bdd958
@ -161,16 +161,6 @@ static void percpu_ref_noop_confirm_switch(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
static void __percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic(struct percpu_ref *ref,
|
||||
percpu_ref_func_t *confirm_switch)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the previous ATOMIC switching hasn't finished yet, wait for
|
||||
* its completion. If the caller ensures that ATOMIC switching
|
||||
* isn't in progress, this function can be called from any context.
|
||||
* Do an extra confirm_switch test to circumvent the unconditional
|
||||
* might_sleep() in wait_event().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ref->confirm_switch)
|
||||
wait_event(percpu_ref_switch_waitq, !ref->confirm_switch);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ref->percpu_count_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC) {
|
||||
if (confirm_switch)
|
||||
confirm_switch(ref);
|
||||
@ -195,16 +185,6 @@ static void __percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count = percpu_count_ptr(ref);
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the previous ATOMIC switching hasn't finished yet, wait for
|
||||
* its completion. If the caller ensures that ATOMIC switching
|
||||
* isn't in progress, this function can be called from any context.
|
||||
* Do an extra confirm_switch test to circumvent the unconditional
|
||||
* might_sleep() in wait_event().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ref->confirm_switch)
|
||||
wait_event(percpu_ref_switch_waitq, !ref->confirm_switch);
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!percpu_count);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(ref->percpu_count_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC))
|
||||
@ -225,6 +205,25 @@ static void __percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
ref->percpu_count_ptr & ~__PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __percpu_ref_switch_mode(struct percpu_ref *ref,
|
||||
percpu_ref_func_t *confirm_switch)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the previous ATOMIC switching hasn't finished yet, wait for
|
||||
* its completion. If the caller ensures that ATOMIC switching
|
||||
* isn't in progress, this function can be called from any context.
|
||||
* Do an extra confirm_switch test to circumvent the unconditional
|
||||
* might_sleep() in wait_event().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ref->confirm_switch)
|
||||
wait_event(percpu_ref_switch_waitq, !ref->confirm_switch);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ref->force_atomic || (ref->percpu_count_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_DEAD))
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic(ref, confirm_switch);
|
||||
else
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(ref);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic - switch a percpu_ref to atomic mode
|
||||
* @ref: percpu_ref to switch to atomic mode
|
||||
@ -241,16 +240,15 @@ static void __percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
* operations. Note that @ref will stay in atomic mode across kill/reinit
|
||||
* cycles until percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu() is called.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function normally doesn't block and can be called from any context
|
||||
* but it may block if @confirm_kill is specified and @ref is already in
|
||||
* the process of switching to atomic mode. In such cases, @confirm_switch
|
||||
* will be invoked after the switching is complete.
|
||||
* This function may block if @ref is in the process of switching to atomic
|
||||
* mode. If the caller ensures that @ref is not in the process of
|
||||
* switching to atomic mode, this function can be called from any context.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic(struct percpu_ref *ref,
|
||||
percpu_ref_func_t *confirm_switch)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ref->force_atomic = true;
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic(ref, confirm_switch);
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_mode(ref, confirm_switch);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@ -267,17 +265,14 @@ void percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic(struct percpu_ref *ref,
|
||||
* dying or dead, the actual switching takes place on the following
|
||||
* percpu_ref_reinit().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function normally doesn't block and can be called from any context
|
||||
* but it may block if @ref is in the process of switching to atomic mode
|
||||
* by percpu_ref_switch_atomic().
|
||||
* This function may block if @ref is in the process of switching to atomic
|
||||
* mode. If the caller ensures that @ref is not in the process of
|
||||
* switching to atomic mode, this function can be called from any context.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ref->force_atomic = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* a dying or dead ref can't be switched to percpu mode w/o reinit */
|
||||
if (!(ref->percpu_count_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_DEAD))
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(ref);
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_mode(ref, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@ -302,7 +297,7 @@ void percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(struct percpu_ref *ref,
|
||||
"%s called more than once on %pf!", __func__, ref->release);
|
||||
|
||||
ref->percpu_count_ptr |= __PERCPU_REF_DEAD;
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic(ref, confirm_kill);
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_mode(ref, confirm_kill);
|
||||
percpu_ref_put(ref);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm);
|
||||
@ -324,7 +319,6 @@ void percpu_ref_reinit(struct percpu_ref *ref)
|
||||
|
||||
ref->percpu_count_ptr &= ~__PERCPU_REF_DEAD;
|
||||
percpu_ref_get(ref);
|
||||
if (!ref->force_atomic)
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(ref);
|
||||
__percpu_ref_switch_mode(ref, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_ref_reinit);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user