pnfs/blocklayout: remove some debugging
The kbuild test robot complained that we got the printk format wrong. Let's just kill these printks instead of fixing them as there is not point after the initial tree algorithm debugging. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d11620e1e
commit
3e3f6b4e26
@ -370,9 +370,6 @@ ext_tree_split(struct rb_root *root, struct pnfs_block_extent *be,
|
||||
struct pnfs_block_extent *new;
|
||||
sector_t orig_len = be->be_length;
|
||||
|
||||
dprintk("%s: need split for 0x%lx:0x%lx at 0x%lx\n",
|
||||
__func__, be->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(be), split);
|
||||
|
||||
new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_ATOMIC);
|
||||
if (!new)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
@ -387,11 +384,6 @@ ext_tree_split(struct rb_root *root, struct pnfs_block_extent *be,
|
||||
new->be_tag = be->be_tag;
|
||||
new->be_device = nfs4_get_deviceid(be->be_device);
|
||||
|
||||
dprintk("%s: got 0x%lx:0x%lx!\n",
|
||||
__func__, be->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(be));
|
||||
dprintk("%s: got 0x%lx:0x%lx!\n",
|
||||
__func__, new->be_f_offset, ext_f_end(new));
|
||||
|
||||
__ext_tree_insert(root, new, false);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user