ARM: OMAP1: Fix use of possibly uninitialized irq variable
The current control flow of IRQ number assignment to `irq` variable allows a request of IRQ of unspecified value, generating a warning under Clang compilation with omap1_defconfig on linux-next: arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:656:11: warning: variable 'irq' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized] else if (cpu_is_omap16xx()) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/include/mach/soc.h:123:30: note: expanded from macro 'cpu_is_omap16xx' ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:658:18: note: uninitialized use occurs here if (request_irq(irq, omap_wakeup_interrupt, 0, "peripheral wakeup", ^~~ arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:656:7: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true else if (cpu_is_omap16xx()) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:611:9: note: initialize the variable 'irq' to silence this warning int irq; ^ = 0 1 warning generated. The patch provides a default value to the `irq` variable along with a validity check. Signed-off-by: Maciej Falkowski <maciej.falkowski9@gmail.com> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1324 Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6efb943b86
commit
3c4e0147c2
@ -655,9 +655,13 @@ static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
|
|||||||
irq = INT_7XX_WAKE_UP_REQ;
|
irq = INT_7XX_WAKE_UP_REQ;
|
||||||
else if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
|
else if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
|
||||||
irq = INT_1610_WAKE_UP_REQ;
|
irq = INT_1610_WAKE_UP_REQ;
|
||||||
if (request_irq(irq, omap_wakeup_interrupt, 0, "peripheral wakeup",
|
else
|
||||||
NULL))
|
irq = -1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (irq >= 0) {
|
||||||
|
if (request_irq(irq, omap_wakeup_interrupt, 0, "peripheral wakeup", NULL))
|
||||||
pr_err("Failed to request irq %d (peripheral wakeup)\n", irq);
|
pr_err("Failed to request irq %d (peripheral wakeup)\n", irq);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Program new power ramp-up time
|
/* Program new power ramp-up time
|
||||||
* (0 for most boards since we don't lower voltage when in deep sleep)
|
* (0 for most boards since we don't lower voltage when in deep sleep)
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user