leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

hwmon: (lm90) Add support for MAX6642

Browse Source 
MAX6642 is a reduced version of LM90 with no low limits and no conversion
rate register. Its alert functionality is broken, similar to many other
chips supported by the lm90 driver.

After this change, the stand-alone max6642 driver is only needed if the
lm90 driver is disabled. Make it dependent on SENSORS_LM90=n to show that
it is not needed if the lm90 driver is enabled.

A devicetree node is not added for this chip since it is quite unlikely
that such an old chip will ever be used in a devicetree based system.
It can be added later if needed.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
This commit is contained in:
Guenter Roeck 2021-11-15 18:10:11 -08:00
parent ca6bfa3b73
commit 3c1ecccbbc
3 changed files with 83 additions and 16 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
Documentation/hwmon/lm90.rst
View File

@ -113,6 +113,16 @@ Supported chips:
https://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions/product.do?id=NCT1008
* Maxim MAX6642
Prefix: 'max6642'
Addresses scanned: I2C 0x48-0x4f
Datasheet: Publicly available at the Maxim website
http://datasheets.maxim-ic.com/en/ds/MAX6642.pdf
* Maxim MAX6646
Prefix: 'max6646'
@ -362,6 +372,12 @@ ADT7481, ADT7482, ADT7483:
* Two remote sensors
* Selectable address (ADT7483)
MAX6642:
* No critical limit register
* Conversion rate not configurable
* Better local resolution (10 bit)
* 10 bit external sensor resolution
MAX6646, MAX6647, MAX6649:
* Better local resolution
* Extended range unsigned external temperature

5
drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
View File

@ -1102,6 +1102,7 @@ config SENSORS_MAX6639
config SENSORS_MAX6642
tristate "Maxim MAX6642 sensor chip"
depends on I2C
depends on SENSORS_LM90=n
help
If you say yes here you get support for MAX6642 sensor chip.
MAX6642 is a SMBus-Compatible Remote/Local Temperature Sensor
@ -1360,8 +1361,8 @@ config SENSORS_LM90
If you say yes here you get support for National Semiconductor LM90,
LM86, LM89 and LM99, Analog Devices ADM1032, ADT7461, ADT7461A,
ADT7481, ADT7482, and ADT7483A,
Maxim MAX6646, MAX6647, MAX6648, MAX6649, MAX6654, MAX6657, MAX6658,
MAX6659, MAX6680, MAX6681, MAX6692, MAX6695, MAX6696,
Maxim MAX6642, MAX6646, MAX6647, MAX6648, MAX6649, MAX6654, MAX6657,
MAX6658, MAX6659, MAX6680, MAX6681, MAX6692, MAX6695, MAX6696,
ON Semiconductor NCT1008, Winbond/Nuvoton W83L771W/G/AWG/ASG,
Philips SA56004, GMT G781, Texas Instruments TMP451 and TMP461
sensor chips.

78
drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
View File

@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = {
0x4d, 0x4e, 0x4f, I2C_CLIENT_END };
enum chips { adm1032, adt7461, adt7461a, adt7481, g781, lm86, lm90, lm99,
max6646, max6648, max6654, max6657, max6659, max6680, max6696,
max6642, max6646, max6648, max6654, max6657, max6659, max6680, max6696,
sa56004, tmp451, tmp461, w83l771,
};
@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm90_id[] = {
{ "lm86", lm86 },
{ "lm89", lm86 },
{ "lm99", lm99 },
{ "max6642", max6642 },
{ "max6646", max6646 },
{ "max6647", max6646 },
{ "max6648", max6648 },
@ -434,6 +435,12 @@ static const struct lm90_params lm90_params[] = {
.alert_alarms = 0x7b,
.max_convrate = 9,
},
[max6642] = {
.flags = LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT | LM90_HAVE_EXT_UNSIGNED,
.alert_alarms = 0x50,
.reg_local_ext = MAX6657_REG_LOCAL_TEMPL,
.resolution = 10,
},
[max6646] = {
.flags = LM90_HAVE_CRIT | LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT
| LM90_HAVE_EXT_UNSIGNED | LM90_HAVE_ALARMS | LM90_HAVE_LOW
@ -1668,18 +1675,18 @@ static const char *lm90_detect_analog(struct i2c_client *client, int chip_id,
return name;
}
static const char *lm90_detect_maxim(struct i2c_client *client, int chip_id,
int config1, int convrate)
static const char *lm90_detect_maxim(struct i2c_client *client, bool common_address,
int chip_id, int config1, int convrate)
{
int man_id, emerg, emerg2, status2;
int address = client->addr;
const char *name = NULL;
if ((address >= 0x48 && address <= 0x4b) || address == 0x4f)
return NULL;
switch (chip_id) {
case 0x01:
if (!common_address)
break;
/*
* We read MAX6659_REG_REMOTE_EMERG twice, and re-read
* LM90_REG_MAN_ID in between. If MAX6659_REG_REMOTE_EMERG
@ -1726,7 +1733,7 @@ static const char *lm90_detect_maxim(struct i2c_client *client, int chip_id,
* The lowest 3 bits of the config1 register are unused and
* should return zero when read.
*/
if (!(config1 & 0x07) && convrate <= 0x07)
if (common_address && !(config1 & 0x07) && convrate <= 0x07)
name = "max6654";
break;
case 0x09:
@ -1739,16 +1746,21 @@ static const char *lm90_detect_maxim(struct i2c_client *client, int chip_id,
* MAX6690 datasheet lists a chip ID of 0x08, and a chip labeled
* MAX6654 was observed to have a chip ID of 0x09.
*/
if (!(config1 & 0x07) && convrate <= 0x07)
if (common_address && !(config1 & 0x07) && convrate <= 0x07)
name = "max6690";
break;
case 0x4d:
/*
* The MAX6657, MAX6658 and MAX6659 do NOT have a chip_id
* MAX6642, MAX6657, MAX6658 and MAX6659 do NOT have a chip_id
* register. Reading from that address will return the last
* read value, which in our case is those of the man_id
* register, or 0x4d. Likewise, the config1 register seems to
* lack a low nibble, so the value will be those of the previous
* register, or 0x4d.
* MAX6642 does not have a conversion rate register, nor low
* limit registers. Reading from those registers returns the
* last read value.
*
* For MAX6657, MAX6658 and MAX6659, the config1 register lacks
* a low nibble, so the value will be those of the previous
* read, so in our case again those of the man_id register.
* MAX6659 has a third set of upper temperature limit registers.
* Those registers also return values on MAX6657 and MAX6658,
@ -1756,8 +1768,40 @@ static const char *lm90_detect_maxim(struct i2c_client *client, int chip_id,
* For this reason it will be mis-detected as MAX6657 if its
* address is 0x4c.
*/
if ((address == 0x4c || address == 0x4d || address == 0x4e) &&
(config1 & 0x1f) == 0x0d && convrate <= 0x09) {
if (address >= 0x48 && address <= 0x4f && config1 == convrate &&
!(config1 & 0x0f)) {
int regval;
/*
* We know that this is not a MAX6657/58/59 because its
* configuration register has the wrong value and it does
* not appear to have a conversion rate register.
*/
/* re-read manufacturer ID to have a good baseline */
if (i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_MAN_ID) != 0x4d)
break;
/* check various non-existing registers */
if (i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_CONVRATE) != 0x4d ||
i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_LOCAL_LOW) != 0x4d ||
i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_REMOTE_LOWH) != 0x4d)
break;
/* check for unused status register bits */
regval = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_STATUS);
if (regval < 0 || (regval & 0x2b))
break;
/* re-check unsupported registers */
if (i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_CONVRATE) != regval ||
i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_LOCAL_LOW) != regval ||
i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_REMOTE_LOWH) != regval)
break;
name = "max6642";
} else if ((address == 0x4c || address == 0x4d || address == 0x4e) &&
(config1 & 0x1f) == 0x0d && convrate <= 0x09) {
if (address == 0x4c)
name = "max6657";
else
@ -1929,6 +1973,11 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *client, struct i2c_board_info *info)
struct i2c_adapter *adapter = client->adapter;
int man_id, chip_id, config1, convrate;
const char *name = NULL;
int address = client->addr;
bool common_address =
(address >= 0x18 && address <= 0x1a) ||
(address >= 0x29 && address <= 0x2b) ||
(address >= 0x4c && address <= 0x4e);
if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA))
return -ENODEV;
@ -1952,7 +2001,8 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *client, struct i2c_board_info *info)
name = lm90_detect_gmt(client, chip_id, config1, convrate);
break;
case 0x4d: /* Maxim Integrated */
name = lm90_detect_maxim(client, chip_id, config1, convrate);
name = lm90_detect_maxim(client, common_address, chip_id,
config1, convrate);
break;
case 0x55: /* TI */
name = lm90_detect_ti(client, chip_id, config1, convrate);