ASoC: topology: Use for loop instead of while

The 'while' loop can be replaced with a 'for' loop, making it more clear
about what possible values there are, by having all of it in one place,
instead of scattered around.

Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401120200.4047867-2-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Amadeusz Sławiński 2022-04-01 14:01:55 +02:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent 3123109284
commit 395f8fd616
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 24D68B725D5487D0

View File

@ -2550,10 +2550,8 @@ static int soc_tplg_process_headers(struct soc_tplg *tplg)
{
int ret;
tplg->pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_START;
/* process the header types from start to end */
while (tplg->pass <= SOC_TPLG_PASS_END) {
for (tplg->pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_START; tplg->pass <= SOC_TPLG_PASS_END; tplg->pass++) {
struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *hdr;
tplg->hdr_pos = tplg->fw->data;
@ -2585,8 +2583,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_process_headers(struct soc_tplg *tplg)
hdr = (struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr *)tplg->hdr_pos;
}
/* next data type pass */
tplg->pass++;
}
/* signal DAPM we are complete */
@ -2653,10 +2649,10 @@ int snd_soc_tplg_component_remove(struct snd_soc_component *comp)
{
struct snd_card *card = comp->card->snd_card;
struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj, *next_dobj;
int pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_END;
int pass;
/* process the header types from end to start */
while (pass >= SOC_TPLG_PASS_START) {
for (pass = SOC_TPLG_PASS_END; pass >= SOC_TPLG_PASS_START; pass--) {
/* remove mixer controls */
down_write(&card->controls_rwsem);
@ -2699,7 +2695,6 @@ int snd_soc_tplg_component_remove(struct snd_soc_component *comp)
}
}
up_write(&card->controls_rwsem);
pass--;
}
/* let caller know if FW can be freed when no objects are left */