drm/i915/region: fix order when adding blocks
When performing an allocation we try split it down into the largest possible power-of-two blocks/pages-sizes, and for the common case we expect to allocate the blocks in descending order. This also naturally fits with our GTT alignment tricks(including the hugepages selftest), where we sometimes try to align to the largest possible GTT page-size for the allocation, in the hope that translates to bigger GTT page-sizes. Currently, we seem to incorrectly add the blocks in the opposite order, which is definitely not the intended behaviour. Reported-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109111249.109365-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
2dae0c8529
commit
330b7d3305
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ __intel_memory_region_get_pages_buddy(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
|
||||
n_pages -= BIT(order);
|
||||
|
||||
block->private = mem;
|
||||
list_add(&block->link, blocks);
|
||||
list_add_tail(&block->link, blocks);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!n_pages)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user