bridge: Handle IFLA_ADDRESS correctly when creating bridge device

When bridge device is created with IFLA_ADDRESS, we are not calling
br_stp_change_bridge_id(), which leads to incorrect local fdb
management and bridge id calculation, and prevents us from receiving
frames on the bridge device.

Reported-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Toshiaki Makita 2014-04-25 17:01:18 +09:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 535cdf3c19
commit 30313a3d57

View File

@ -445,6 +445,20 @@ static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
return 0;
}
static int br_dev_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
{
struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
br_stp_change_bridge_id(br, nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]));
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
}
return register_netdevice(dev);
}
static size_t br_get_link_af_size(const struct net_device *dev)
{
struct net_port_vlans *pv;
@ -473,6 +487,7 @@ struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_mostly = {
.priv_size = sizeof(struct net_bridge),
.setup = br_dev_setup,
.validate = br_validate,
.newlink = br_dev_newlink,
.dellink = br_dev_delete,
};