posix-cpu-timers: Create a container struct
Per task/process data of posix CPU timers is all over the place which makes the code hard to follow and requires ifdeffery. Create a container to hold all this information in one place, so data is consolidated and the ifdeffery can be confined to the posix timer header file and removed from places like fork. As a first step, move the cpu_timers list head array into the new struct and clean up the initializers and simplify fork. The remaining #ifdef in fork will be removed later. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190821192920.819418976@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1523,6 +1523,7 @@ void __cleanup_sighand(struct sighand_struct *sighand)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct posix_cputimers *pct = &sig->posix_cputimers;
|
||||
unsigned long cpu_limit;
|
||||
|
||||
cpu_limit = READ_ONCE(sig->rlim[RLIMIT_CPU].rlim_cur);
|
||||
@@ -1531,10 +1532,7 @@ static void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig)
|
||||
sig->cputimer.running = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* The timer lists. */
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sig->cpu_timers[0]);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sig->cpu_timers[1]);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sig->cpu_timers[2]);
|
||||
posix_cputimers_init(pct);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static inline void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig) { }
|
||||
@@ -1649,9 +1647,8 @@ static void posix_cpu_timers_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
tsk->cputime_expires.prof_exp = 0;
|
||||
tsk->cputime_expires.virt_exp = 0;
|
||||
tsk->cputime_expires.sched_exp = 0;
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tsk->cpu_timers[0]);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tsk->cpu_timers[1]);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tsk->cpu_timers[2]);
|
||||
|
||||
posix_cputimers_init(&tsk->posix_cputimers);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static inline void posix_cpu_timers_init(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user