forked from Minki/linux
iommu/vt-d: Fix scatterlist offset handling
The intel-iommu DMA ops fail to correctly handle scatterlists where sg->offset is greater than PAGE_SIZE - the IOVA allocation is computed appropriately based on the page-aligned portion of the offset, but the mapping is set up relative to sg->page, which means it fails to actually cover the whole buffer (and in the worst case doesn't cover it at all): (sg->dma_address + sg->dma_len) ----+ sg->dma_address ---------+ | iov_pfn------+ | | | | | v v v iova: a b c d e f |--------|--------|--------|--------|--------| <...calculated....> [_____mapped______] pfn: 0 1 2 3 4 5 |--------|--------|--------|--------|--------| ^ ^ ^ | | | sg->page ----+ | | sg->offset --------------+ | (sg->offset + sg->length) ----------+ As a result, the caller ends up overrunning the mapping into whatever lies beyond, which usually goes badly: [ 429.645492] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 [ 429.650847] DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [02:00.4] fault addr f2682000 ... Whilst this is a fairly rare occurrence, it can happen from the result of intermediate scatterlist processing such as scatterwalk_ffwd() in the crypto layer. Whilst that particular site could be fixed up, it still seems worthwhile to bring intel-iommu in line with other DMA API implementations in handling this robustly. To that end, fix the intel_map_sg() path to line up the mapping correctly (in units of MM pages rather than VT-d pages to match the aligned_nrpages() calculation) regardless of the offset, and use sg_phys() consistently for clarity. Reported-by: Harsh Jain <Harsh@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Reviewed by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Tested by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cf9b0772f2
commit
29a90b7089
@ -2250,10 +2250,12 @@ static int __domain_mapping(struct dmar_domain *domain, unsigned long iov_pfn,
|
||||
uint64_t tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!sg_res) {
|
||||
unsigned int pgoff = sg->offset & ~PAGE_MASK;
|
||||
|
||||
sg_res = aligned_nrpages(sg->offset, sg->length);
|
||||
sg->dma_address = ((dma_addr_t)iov_pfn << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) + sg->offset;
|
||||
sg->dma_address = ((dma_addr_t)iov_pfn << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT) + pgoff;
|
||||
sg->dma_length = sg->length;
|
||||
pteval = page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) | prot;
|
||||
pteval = (sg_phys(sg) - pgoff) | prot;
|
||||
phys_pfn = pteval >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3787,7 +3789,7 @@ static int intel_nontranslate_map_sg(struct device *hddev,
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_sg(sglist, sg, nelems, i) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(!sg_page(sg));
|
||||
sg->dma_address = page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;
|
||||
sg->dma_address = sg_phys(sg);
|
||||
sg->dma_length = sg->length;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nelems;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user