perf/x86: Change x86_pmu::limit_period signature
In preparation for making it a static_call, change the signature. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829101321.573713839@infradead.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
e577bb17a1
commit
28f0f3c44b
@ -1224,16 +1224,14 @@ static ssize_t amd_event_sysfs_show(char *page, u64 config)
|
||||
return x86_event_sysfs_show(page, config, event);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u64 amd_pmu_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 left)
|
||||
static void amd_pmu_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, s64 *left)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Decrease period by the depth of the BRS feature to get the last N
|
||||
* taken branches and approximate the desired period
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (has_branch_stack(event) && left > x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
|
||||
left -= x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
|
||||
|
||||
return left;
|
||||
if (has_branch_stack(event) && *left > x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
|
||||
*left -= x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __initconst const struct x86_pmu amd_pmu = {
|
||||
|
@ -621,8 +621,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
|
||||
event->hw.config |= event->attr.config & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK;
|
||||
|
||||
if (event->attr.sample_period && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
|
||||
if (x86_pmu.limit_period(event, event->attr.sample_period) >
|
||||
event->attr.sample_period)
|
||||
s64 left = event->attr.sample_period;
|
||||
x86_pmu.limit_period(event, &left);
|
||||
if (left > event->attr.sample_period)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1396,9 +1397,9 @@ int x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
|
||||
left = x86_pmu.max_period;
|
||||
|
||||
if (x86_pmu.limit_period)
|
||||
left = x86_pmu.limit_period(event, left);
|
||||
x86_pmu.limit_period(event, &left);
|
||||
|
||||
per_cpu(pmc_prev_left[idx], smp_processor_id()) = left;
|
||||
this_cpu_write(pmc_prev_left[idx], left);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The hw event starts counting from this event offset,
|
||||
@ -2677,7 +2678,9 @@ static int x86_pmu_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (value && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
|
||||
if (x86_pmu.limit_period(event, value) > value)
|
||||
s64 left = value;
|
||||
x86_pmu.limit_period(event, &left);
|
||||
if (left > value)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4344,28 +4344,25 @@ static u8 adl_get_hybrid_cpu_type(void)
|
||||
* Therefore the effective (average) period matches the requested period,
|
||||
* despite coarser hardware granularity.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static u64 bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 left)
|
||||
static void bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, s64 *left)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ((event->hw.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
|
||||
X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
|
||||
if (left < 128)
|
||||
left = 128;
|
||||
left &= ~0x3fULL;
|
||||
if (*left < 128)
|
||||
*left = 128;
|
||||
*left &= ~0x3fULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return left;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u64 nhm_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 left)
|
||||
static void nhm_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, s64 *left)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return max(left, 32ULL);
|
||||
*left = max(*left, 32LL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u64 spr_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 left)
|
||||
static void spr_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, s64 *left)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (event->attr.precise_ip == 3)
|
||||
return max(left, 128ULL);
|
||||
|
||||
return left;
|
||||
*left = max(*left, 128LL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-7" );
|
||||
|
@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
|
||||
struct event_constraint *event_constraints;
|
||||
struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirks;
|
||||
int perfctr_second_write;
|
||||
u64 (*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, u64 l);
|
||||
void (*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, s64 *l);
|
||||
|
||||
/* PMI handler bits */
|
||||
unsigned int late_ack :1,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user