From 278f7b4fffce9ad267406cf8800df271d14f4a16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:13:13 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] caif: fix a signedness bug in cfpkt_iterate()
The cfpkt_iterate() function can return -EPROTO on error, but the
function is a u16 so the negative value gets truncated to a positive
unsigned short. This causes a static checker warning.
The only caller which might care is cffrml_receive(), when it's checking
the frame checksum. I modified cffrml_receive() so that it never says
-EPROTO is a valid checksum.
Also this isn't ever going to be inlined so I removed the "inline".
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
include/net/caif/cfpkt.h | 2 +-
net/caif/cffrml.c | 2 +-
net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/caif/cfpkt.h b/include/net/caif/cfpkt.h
index 1c1ad46250d5..fe328c52c46b 100644
--- a/include/net/caif/cfpkt.h
+++ b/include/net/caif/cfpkt.h
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ struct cfpkt *cfpkt_split(struct cfpkt *pkt, u16 pos);
* @return Checksum of buffer.
*/
-u16 cfpkt_iterate(struct cfpkt *pkt,
+int cfpkt_iterate(struct cfpkt *pkt,
u16 (*iter_func)(u16 chks, void *buf, u16 len),
u16 data);
diff --git a/net/caif/cffrml.c b/net/caif/cffrml.c
index 8bc7caa28e64..434ba8557826 100644
--- a/net/caif/cffrml.c
+++ b/net/caif/cffrml.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int cffrml_receive(struct cflayer *layr, struct cfpkt *pkt)
u16 tmp;
u16 len;
u16 hdrchks;
- u16 pktchks;
+ int pktchks;
struct cffrml *this;
this = container_obj(layr);
diff --git a/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c b/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c
index 1be0b521ac49..f6c3b2137eea 100644
--- a/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c
+++ b/net/caif/cfpkt_skbuff.c
@@ -255,9 +255,9 @@ inline u16 cfpkt_getlen(struct cfpkt *pkt)
return skb->len;
}
-inline u16 cfpkt_iterate(struct cfpkt *pkt,
- u16 (*iter_func)(u16, void *, u16),
- u16 data)
+int cfpkt_iterate(struct cfpkt *pkt,
+ u16 (*iter_func)(u16, void *, u16),
+ u16 data)
{
/*
* Don't care about the performance hit of linearizing,