pwm: tiecap: Ensure configuring period and duty_cycle isn't wrongly skipped

As the last call to ecap_pwm_apply() might have exited early if
state->enabled was false, the values for period and duty_cycle stored in
pwm->state might not have been written to hardware and it must be
ensured that they are configured before enabling the PWM.

Fixes: 0ca7acd847 ("pwm: tiecap: Implement .apply() callback")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Uwe Kleine-König 2021-07-01 10:27:53 +02:00 committed by Thierry Reding
parent fe8255f80b
commit 25f70b8f3d

View File

@ -189,16 +189,13 @@ static int ecap_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
return 0;
}
if (state->period != pwm->state.period ||
state->duty_cycle != pwm->state.duty_cycle) {
if (state->period > NSEC_PER_SEC)
return -ERANGE;
if (state->period > NSEC_PER_SEC)
return -ERANGE;
err = ecap_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle,
state->period, enabled);
if (err)
return err;
}
err = ecap_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle,
state->period, enabled);
if (err)
return err;
if (!enabled)
return ecap_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);