forked from Minki/linux
drm/i915/execlists: Reduce list_for_each_safe+list_safe_reset_next
After staring at the list_for_each_safe macros for a bit, our current invocation of list_safe_reset_next in execlists_schedule() simply reduces to list_for_each. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180102151235.3949-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
ce01b17377
commit
2221c5b7dd
@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
|
||||
* end result is a topological list of requests in reverse order, the
|
||||
* last element in the list is the request we must execute first.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, p, &dfs, dfs_link) {
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(dep, &dfs, dfs_link) {
|
||||
struct i915_priotree *pt = dep->signaler;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1048,8 +1048,6 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
|
||||
if (prio > READ_ONCE(p->signaler->priority))
|
||||
list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
list_safe_reset_next(dep, p, dfs_link);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user