drm/i915/fbc: split intel_fbc_update into pre and post update
So now pre_update will be responsible for unconditionally deactivating FBC and updating the state cache, while post_update will be responsible for checking if it can be enabled, then enabling it. This is one more step into proper locking. Notice that intel_fbc_flush now calls post_update directly. The FBC flush can only happen for drawing operations - since we explicitly ignore the flips -, so the FBC state is not expected to have changed at this point. With this we can just run post_update, which will make sure we won't deactivate+reactivate FBC as would be the case now if we called pre_update + post_update. Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-11-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
aaf78d276b
commit
212890cfcd
@ -896,24 +896,16 @@ static bool intel_fbc_reg_params_equal(struct intel_fbc_reg_params *params1,
|
||||
return memcmp(params1, params2, sizeof(*params1)) == 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* __intel_fbc_update - activate/deactivate FBC as needed, unlocked
|
||||
* @crtc: the CRTC that triggered the update
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function completely reevaluates the status of FBC, then activates,
|
||||
* deactivates or maintains it on the same state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void __intel_fbc_update(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
|
||||
static void intel_fbc_pre_update(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = crtc->base.dev->dev_private;
|
||||
struct intel_fbc *fbc = &dev_priv->fbc;
|
||||
struct intel_fbc_reg_params old_params;
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&fbc->lock));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!multiple_pipes_ok(dev_priv)) {
|
||||
set_no_fbc_reason(dev_priv, "more than one pipe active");
|
||||
goto out_disable;
|
||||
goto deactivate;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!fbc->enabled || fbc->crtc != crtc)
|
||||
@ -921,8 +913,25 @@ static void __intel_fbc_update(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
|
||||
|
||||
intel_fbc_update_state_cache(crtc);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!intel_fbc_can_activate(crtc))
|
||||
goto out_disable;
|
||||
deactivate:
|
||||
__intel_fbc_deactivate(dev_priv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void intel_fbc_post_update(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = crtc->base.dev->dev_private;
|
||||
struct intel_fbc *fbc = &dev_priv->fbc;
|
||||
struct intel_fbc_reg_params old_params;
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&fbc->lock));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!fbc->enabled || fbc->crtc != crtc)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!intel_fbc_can_activate(crtc)) {
|
||||
WARN_ON(fbc->active);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
old_params = fbc->params;
|
||||
intel_fbc_get_reg_params(crtc, &fbc->params);
|
||||
@ -936,44 +945,9 @@ static void __intel_fbc_update(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
|
||||
intel_fbc_reg_params_equal(&old_params, &fbc->params))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (intel_fbc_is_active(dev_priv)) {
|
||||
/* We update FBC along two paths, after changing fb/crtc
|
||||
* configuration (modeswitching) and after page-flipping
|
||||
* finishes. For the latter, we know that not only did
|
||||
* we disable the FBC at the start of the page-flip
|
||||
* sequence, but also more than one vblank has passed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For the former case of modeswitching, it is possible
|
||||
* to switch between two FBC valid configurations
|
||||
* instantaneously so we do need to disable the FBC
|
||||
* before we can modify its control registers. We also
|
||||
* have to wait for the next vblank for that to take
|
||||
* effect. However, since we delay enabling FBC we can
|
||||
* assume that a vblank has passed since disabling and
|
||||
* that we can safely alter the registers in the deferred
|
||||
* callback.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In the scenario that we go from a valid to invalid
|
||||
* and then back to valid FBC configuration we have
|
||||
* no strict enforcement that a vblank occurred since
|
||||
* disabling the FBC. However, along all current pipe
|
||||
* disabling paths we do need to wait for a vblank at
|
||||
* some point. And we wait before enabling FBC anyway.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("deactivating FBC for update\n");
|
||||
__intel_fbc_deactivate(dev_priv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__intel_fbc_deactivate(dev_priv);
|
||||
intel_fbc_schedule_activation(crtc);
|
||||
fbc->no_fbc_reason = "FBC enabled (not necessarily active)";
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
out_disable:
|
||||
/* Multiple disables should be harmless */
|
||||
if (intel_fbc_is_active(dev_priv)) {
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unsupported config, deactivating FBC\n");
|
||||
__intel_fbc_deactivate(dev_priv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
fbc->no_fbc_reason = "FBC enabled (active or scheduled)";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -991,7 +965,8 @@ void intel_fbc_update(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&fbc->lock);
|
||||
__intel_fbc_update(crtc);
|
||||
intel_fbc_pre_update(crtc);
|
||||
intel_fbc_post_update(crtc);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&fbc->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1045,7 +1020,7 @@ void intel_fbc_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
||||
if (fbc->active)
|
||||
intel_fbc_recompress(dev_priv);
|
||||
else
|
||||
__intel_fbc_update(fbc->crtc);
|
||||
intel_fbc_post_update(fbc->crtc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&fbc->lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user