forked from Minki/linux
mutex: Fix/document access-once assumption in mutex_can_spin_on_owner()
mutex_can_spin_on_owner() is technically broken in that it would in theory allow the compiler to load lock->owner twice, seeing a pointer first time and a NULL pointer the second time. Linus pointed out that a compiler has to be seriously broken to not compile this correctly - but nevertheless this change is correct as it will better document the implementation. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com> Acked-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130719183101.GA20909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c4be9cb4f1
commit
1e40c2edef
@ -209,11 +209,13 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *owner;
|
||||
int retval = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
if (lock->owner)
|
||||
retval = lock->owner->on_cpu;
|
||||
owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner);
|
||||
if (owner)
|
||||
retval = owner->on_cpu;
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* if lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have just acquired
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user