btrfs: add assertions where number of devices could go below 0
In preparation to add helper function to deduce the num_devices with replace running, use assert instead of BUG_ON or WARN_ON. The number of devices would not normally drop to 0 due to other checks so the assert is sufficient. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog, adjust the assert condition ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path,
|
|||||||
num_devices = fs_devices->num_devices;
|
num_devices = fs_devices->num_devices;
|
||||||
btrfs_dev_replace_read_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
|
btrfs_dev_replace_read_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
|
||||||
if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) {
|
if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) {
|
||||||
WARN_ON(num_devices < 1);
|
ASSERT(num_devices > 1);
|
||||||
num_devices--;
|
num_devices--;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
btrfs_dev_replace_read_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
|
btrfs_dev_replace_read_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
|
||||||
@@ -3743,7 +3743,7 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||||||
num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices;
|
num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices;
|
||||||
btrfs_dev_replace_read_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
|
btrfs_dev_replace_read_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
|
||||||
if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) {
|
if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) {
|
||||||
BUG_ON(num_devices < 1);
|
ASSERT(num_devices > 1);
|
||||||
num_devices--;
|
num_devices--;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
btrfs_dev_replace_read_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
|
btrfs_dev_replace_read_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace);
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user