s390/uv: fix memblock virtual vs physical address confusion

memblock_alloc_try_nid() returns a virtual address, however in error
case the allocated memory is incorrectly freed with memblock_phys_free().
Properly use memblock_free() instead, and pass a physical address to
uv_init() to fix this.

Note: this doesn't fix a bug currently, since virtual and physical
addresses are identical.

Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Heiko Carstens 2021-12-13 19:16:38 +01:00
parent fcfcba6dfc
commit 15b5c1833a

View File

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int __bootdata_preserved(prot_virt_host);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(prot_virt_host);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(uv_info);
static int __init uv_init(unsigned long stor_base, unsigned long stor_len)
static int __init uv_init(phys_addr_t stor_base, unsigned long stor_len)
{
struct uv_cb_init uvcb = {
.header.cmd = UVC_CMD_INIT_UV,
@ -49,12 +49,12 @@ static int __init uv_init(unsigned long stor_base, unsigned long stor_len)
void __init setup_uv(void)
{
unsigned long uv_stor_base;
void *uv_stor_base;
if (!is_prot_virt_host())
return;
uv_stor_base = (unsigned long)memblock_alloc_try_nid(
uv_stor_base = memblock_alloc_try_nid(
uv_info.uv_base_stor_len, SZ_1M, SZ_2G,
MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, NUMA_NO_NODE);
if (!uv_stor_base) {
@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ void __init setup_uv(void)
goto fail;
}
if (uv_init(uv_stor_base, uv_info.uv_base_stor_len)) {
memblock_phys_free(uv_stor_base, uv_info.uv_base_stor_len);
if (uv_init(__pa(uv_stor_base), uv_info.uv_base_stor_len)) {
memblock_free(uv_stor_base, uv_info.uv_base_stor_len);
goto fail;
}