forked from Minki/linux
x86, fpu: Introduce per-cpu in_kernel_fpu state
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() tries to detect if kernel_fpu_begin() is safe or not. In particular it should obviously deny the nested kernel_fpu_begin() and this logic looks very confusing. If use_eager_fpu() == T we rely on a) __thread_has_fpu() check in interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(), and b) on the fact that _begin() does __thread_clear_has_fpu(). Otherwise we demand that the interrupted task has no FPU if it is in kernel mode, this works because __kernel_fpu_begin() does clts() and interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() checks X86_CR0_TS. Add the per-cpu "bool in_kernel_fpu" variable, and change this code to check/set/clear it. This allows to do more cleanups and fixes, see the next changes. The patch also moves WARN_ON_ONCE() under preempt_disable() just to make this_cpu_read() look better, this is not really needed. And in fact I think we should move it into __kernel_fpu_begin(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com Cc: bp@suse.de Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: luto@amacapital.net Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150115191943.GB27332@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ca7a8a150
commit
14e153ef75
@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ extern void __kernel_fpu_end(void);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable());
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable());
|
||||
__kernel_fpu_begin();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
|
||||
#include <asm/fpu-internal.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/user.h>
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, in_kernel_fpu);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Were we in an interrupt that interrupted kernel mode?
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -33,6 +35,9 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (this_cpu_read(in_kernel_fpu))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (use_eager_fpu())
|
||||
return __thread_has_fpu(current);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -73,6 +78,8 @@ void __kernel_fpu_begin(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *me = current;
|
||||
|
||||
this_cpu_write(in_kernel_fpu, true);
|
||||
|
||||
if (__thread_has_fpu(me)) {
|
||||
__thread_clear_has_fpu(me);
|
||||
__save_init_fpu(me);
|
||||
@ -99,6 +106,8 @@ void __kernel_fpu_end(void)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
stts();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
this_cpu_write(in_kernel_fpu, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kernel_fpu_end);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user