radix-tree: improve multiorder iterators
This fixes several interlinked problems with the iterators in the presence of multiorder entries. 1. radix_tree_iter_next() would only advance by one slot, which would result in the iterators returning the same entry more than once if there were sibling entries. 2. radix_tree_next_slot() could return an internal pointer instead of a user pointer if a tagged multiorder entry was immediately followed by an entry of lower order. 3. radix_tree_next_slot() expanded to a lot more code than it used to when multiorder support was compiled in. And I wasn't comfortable with entry_to_node() being in a header file. Fixing radix_tree_iter_next() for the presence of sibling entries necessarily involves examining the contents of the radix tree, so we now need to pass 'slot' to radix_tree_iter_next(), and we need to change the calling convention so it is called *before* dropping the lock which protects the tree. Also rename it to radix_tree_iter_resume(), as some people thought it was necessary to call radix_tree_iter_next() each time around the loop. radix_tree_next_slot() becomes closer to how it looked before multiorder support was introduced. It only checks to see if the next entry in the chunk is a sibling entry or a pointer to a node; this should be rare enough that handling this case out of line is not a performance impact (and such impact is amortised by the fact that the entry we just processed was a multiorder entry). Also, radix_tree_next_slot() used to force a new chunk lookup for untagged entries, which is more expensive than the out of line sibling entry skipping. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-55-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Linus Torvalds
parent
b35df27a39
commit
148deab223
@@ -231,11 +231,14 @@ void multiorder_iteration(void)
|
||||
radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &tree, &iter, j) {
|
||||
int height = order[i] / RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
|
||||
int shift = height * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT;
|
||||
int mask = (1 << order[i]) - 1;
|
||||
unsigned long mask = (1UL << order[i]) - 1;
|
||||
struct item *item = *slot;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(iter.index >= (index[i] &~ mask));
|
||||
assert(iter.index <= (index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert((iter.index | mask) == (index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert(iter.shift == shift);
|
||||
assert(!radix_tree_is_internal_node(item));
|
||||
assert((item->index | mask) == (index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert(item->order == order[i]);
|
||||
i++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -269,7 +272,7 @@ void multiorder_tagged_iteration(void)
|
||||
assert(radix_tree_tag_set(&tree, tag_index[i], 1));
|
||||
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < 256; j++) {
|
||||
int mask, k;
|
||||
int k;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < TAG_ENTRIES; i++) {
|
||||
for (k = i; index[k] < tag_index[i]; k++)
|
||||
@@ -279,12 +282,16 @@ void multiorder_tagged_iteration(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &tree, &iter, j, 1) {
|
||||
unsigned long mask;
|
||||
struct item *item = *slot;
|
||||
for (k = i; index[k] < tag_index[i]; k++)
|
||||
;
|
||||
mask = (1 << order[k]) - 1;
|
||||
mask = (1UL << order[k]) - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(iter.index >= (tag_index[i] &~ mask));
|
||||
assert(iter.index <= (tag_index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert((iter.index | mask) == (tag_index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert(!radix_tree_is_internal_node(item));
|
||||
assert((item->index | mask) == (tag_index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert(item->order == order[k]);
|
||||
i++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -303,12 +310,15 @@ void multiorder_tagged_iteration(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &tree, &iter, j, 2) {
|
||||
struct item *item = *slot;
|
||||
for (k = i; index[k] < tag_index[i]; k++)
|
||||
;
|
||||
mask = (1 << order[k]) - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(iter.index >= (tag_index[i] &~ mask));
|
||||
assert(iter.index <= (tag_index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert((iter.index | mask) == (tag_index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert(!radix_tree_is_internal_node(item));
|
||||
assert((item->index | mask) == (tag_index[i] | mask));
|
||||
assert(item->order == order[k]);
|
||||
i++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user