s390/mm: correct comment about segment table entries
The comment describing the bit encoding for segment table entries is incorrect in regard to the read and write bits. The segment read bit is 0x0002 and write is 0x0001, not the other way around. Reported-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									758d39ebd3
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						13c6a790d7
					
				| @ -298,15 +298,15 @@ static inline int is_module_addr(void *addr) | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| /*
 | ||||
|  * Segment table entry encoding (R = read-only, I = invalid, y = young bit): | ||||
|  *				dy..R...I...wr | ||||
|  *				dy..R...I...rw | ||||
|  * prot-none, clean, old	00..1...1...00 | ||||
|  * prot-none, clean, young	01..1...1...00 | ||||
|  * prot-none, dirty, old	10..1...1...00 | ||||
|  * prot-none, dirty, young	11..1...1...00 | ||||
|  * read-only, clean, old	00..1...1...01 | ||||
|  * read-only, clean, young	01..1...0...01 | ||||
|  * read-only, dirty, old	10..1...1...01 | ||||
|  * read-only, dirty, young	11..1...0...01 | ||||
|  * read-only, clean, old	00..1...1...10 | ||||
|  * read-only, clean, young	01..1...0...10 | ||||
|  * read-only, dirty, old	10..1...1...10 | ||||
|  * read-only, dirty, young	11..1...0...10 | ||||
|  * read-write, clean, old	00..1...1...11 | ||||
|  * read-write, clean, young	01..1...0...11 | ||||
|  * read-write, dirty, old	10..0...1...11 | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user