From 0d606e2c9fccdd4e67febf1e2da500e1bfe9e045 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:59:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix type-widening bug in inode table readahead code
Due to a missing cast, the high 32-bits of a 64-bit block number used
when calculating the readahead block for inode tables can get lost.
This means we can end up fetching the wrong blocks for readahead for
file systems > 16TB.
Linus found this when experimenting with an enhacement to the sparse
static code checker which checks for missing widening casts before
binary "not" operators.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index d7518e2728f1..793d44b84d7f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4011,13 +4011,14 @@ make_io:
if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_inode_readahead_blks) {
ext4_fsblk_t b, end, table;
unsigned num;
+ __u32 ra_blks = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_inode_readahead_blks;
table = ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp);
/* s_inode_readahead_blks is always a power of 2 */
- b = block & ~(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_inode_readahead_blks-1);
+ b = block & ~((ext4_fsblk_t) ra_blks - 1);
if (table > b)
b = table;
- end = b + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_inode_readahead_blks;
+ end = b + ra_blks;
num = EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb);
if (ext4_has_group_desc_csum(sb))
num -= ext4_itable_unused_count(sb, gdp);