forked from Minki/linux
io_uring: don't use {test,clear}_tsk_thread_flag() for current
Linus correctly points out that this is both unnecessary and generates much worse code on some archs as going from current to thread_info is actually backwards - and obviously just wasteful, since the thread_info is what we care about. Since io_uring only operates on current for these operations, just use test_thread_flag() instead. For io-wq, we can further simplify and use tracehook_notify_signal() to handle the TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL work and clear the flag. The latter isn't an actual bug right now, but it may very well be in the future if we place other work items under TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL. Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/CAHk-=wgYhNck33YHKZ14mFB5MzTTk8gqXHcfj=RWTAXKwgQJgg@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0031275d11
commit
0b8cfa974d
@ -388,11 +388,9 @@ static struct io_wq_work *io_get_next_work(struct io_wqe *wqe)
|
||||
|
||||
static bool io_flush_signals(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))) {
|
||||
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))) {
|
||||
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
if (current->task_works)
|
||||
task_work_run();
|
||||
clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL);
|
||||
tracehook_notify_signal();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
@ -6873,7 +6873,7 @@ static int io_run_task_work_sig(void)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
if (!signal_pending(current))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
|
||||
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
|
||||
return -ERESTARTSYS;
|
||||
return -EINTR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user