sock: optimise sock_def_write_space barriers
Now we have a separate path for sock_def_write_space() and can go one step further. When it's called from sock_wfree() we know that there is a preceding atomic for putting down ->sk_wmem_alloc. We can use it to replace to replace smb_mb() with a less expensive smp_mb__after_atomic(). It also removes an extra RCU read lock/unlock as a small bonus. Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
052ada0968
commit
0a8afd9f02
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@
|
|||||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(proto_list_mutex);
|
static DEFINE_MUTEX(proto_list_mutex);
|
||||||
static LIST_HEAD(proto_list);
|
static LIST_HEAD(proto_list);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static void sock_def_write_space_wfree(struct sock *sk);
|
||||||
static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk);
|
static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
@@ -2333,7 +2334,7 @@ void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
|
|||||||
sk->sk_write_space == sock_def_write_space) {
|
sk->sk_write_space == sock_def_write_space) {
|
||||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||||
free = refcount_sub_and_test(len, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
|
free = refcount_sub_and_test(len, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
|
||||||
sock_def_write_space(sk);
|
sock_def_write_space_wfree(sk);
|
||||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
if (unlikely(free))
|
if (unlikely(free))
|
||||||
__sk_free(sk);
|
__sk_free(sk);
|
||||||
@@ -3218,6 +3219,29 @@ static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk)
|
|||||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* An optimised version of sock_def_write_space(), should only be called
|
||||||
|
* for SOCK_RCU_FREE sockets under RCU read section and after putting
|
||||||
|
* ->sk_wmem_alloc.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
static void sock_def_write_space_wfree(struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
/* Do not wake up a writer until he can make "significant"
|
||||||
|
* progress. --DaveM
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (sock_writeable(sk)) {
|
||||||
|
struct socket_wq *wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* rely on refcount_sub from sock_wfree() */
|
||||||
|
smp_mb__after_atomic();
|
||||||
|
if (wq && waitqueue_active(&wq->wait))
|
||||||
|
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLOUT |
|
||||||
|
EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLWRBAND);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */
|
||||||
|
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void sock_def_destruct(struct sock *sk)
|
static void sock_def_destruct(struct sock *sk)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user