forked from Minki/linux
amd-xgbe: fix the SFP compliance codes check for DAC cables
The current XGBE code assumes that offset 6 of EEPROM SFP DAC (passive)
cables is NULL. However, some cables (the 5 meter and 7 meter Molex
passive cables) have non-zero data at offset 6. Fix the logic by moving
the passive cable check above the active checks, so as not to be
improperly identified as an active cable. This will fix the issue for
any passive cable that advertises 1000Base-CX in offset 6.
Fixes: abf0a1c2b2
("amd-xgbe: Add support for SFP+ modules")
Signed-off-by: Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@amd.com>
Acked-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fc75c032ae
commit
09c5f6bf11
@ -1151,7 +1151,10 @@ static void xgbe_phy_sfp_parse_eeprom(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Determine the type of SFP */
|
||||
if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_SR)
|
||||
if (phy_data->sfp_cable == XGBE_SFP_CABLE_PASSIVE &&
|
||||
xgbe_phy_sfp_bit_rate(sfp_eeprom, XGBE_SFP_SPEED_10000))
|
||||
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_CR;
|
||||
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_SR)
|
||||
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_SR;
|
||||
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_LR)
|
||||
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_LR;
|
||||
@ -1167,9 +1170,6 @@ static void xgbe_phy_sfp_parse_eeprom(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata)
|
||||
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_CX;
|
||||
else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_1GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_1GBE_CC_T)
|
||||
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_T;
|
||||
else if ((phy_data->sfp_cable == XGBE_SFP_CABLE_PASSIVE) &&
|
||||
xgbe_phy_sfp_bit_rate(sfp_eeprom, XGBE_SFP_SPEED_10000))
|
||||
phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_CR;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (phy_data->sfp_base) {
|
||||
case XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_T:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user