forked from Minki/linux
net: bpf: reject invalid shifts
On ARM64, a BUG() is triggered in the eBPF JIT if a filter with a constant shift that can't be encoded in the immediate field of the UBFM/SBFM instructions is passed to the JIT. Since these shifts amounts, which are negative or >= regsize, are invalid, reject them in the eBPF verifier and the classic BPF filter checker, for all architectures. Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
03d84a5f83
commit
06928b3870
@ -1121,6 +1121,16 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((opcode == BPF_LSH || opcode == BPF_RSH ||
|
||||
opcode == BPF_ARSH) && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
|
||||
int size = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 ? 64 : 32;
|
||||
|
||||
if (insn->imm < 0 || insn->imm >= size) {
|
||||
verbose("invalid shift %d\n", insn->imm);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* pattern match 'bpf_add Rx, imm' instruction */
|
||||
if (opcode == BPF_ADD && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
|
||||
regs[insn->dst_reg].type == FRAME_PTR &&
|
||||
|
@ -777,6 +777,11 @@ static int bpf_check_classic(const struct sock_filter *filter,
|
||||
if (ftest->k == 0)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
|
||||
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
|
||||
if (ftest->k >= 32)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_LD | BPF_MEM:
|
||||
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM:
|
||||
case BPF_ST:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user