forked from Minki/linux
docs: netdev: document that patch series length limit
We had been asking people to avoid massive patch series but it does not appear in the FAQ. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
280e3a857d
commit
02514a067f
@ -136,6 +136,20 @@ it to the maintainer to figure out what is the most recent and current
|
||||
version that should be applied. If there is any doubt, the maintainer
|
||||
will reply and ask what should be done.
|
||||
|
||||
How do I divide my work into patches?
|
||||
-------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Put yourself in the shoes of the reviewer. Each patch is read separately
|
||||
and therefore should constitute a comprehensible step towards your stated
|
||||
goal.
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid sending series longer than 15 patches. Larger series takes longer
|
||||
to review as reviewers will defer looking at it until they find a large
|
||||
chunk of time. A small series can be reviewed in a short time, so Maintainers
|
||||
just do it. As a result, a sequence of smaller series gets merged quicker and
|
||||
with better review coverage. Re-posting large series also increases the mailing
|
||||
list traffic.
|
||||
|
||||
I made changes to only a few patches in a patch series should I resend only those changed?
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
No, please resend the entire patch series and make sure you do number your
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user